Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "acheck".
Did you mean:
check
2007 Feb 05
5
Asterisk Faxing Support
...uired for FoIP support also have
no interest in writing any further faxing support for Asterisk (RxFax,
TxFax + the newest span_dsp wont even compile, much less work under
Asterisk any more) probably because they know it will never be
included into the Asterisk code.
On 2/5/07, Checkov, Andrew <acheck@astelnet.net> wrote:
> Some addition: I tried the same boxes with Asterisk 1.2 and 1.4 - no success
> at all - it seems that you can get T.38 with Asterisk ONLY with
> Reinvite enabled (but it doesn't work reliable in case of NAT) -
> no T.38 passthrough as with openpbx.org.
>...
2014 May 13
0
package compositions removed CRAN. Explain please the output?
...0.016 8.619
replot 7.078 0.012 7.113
* checking for unstated dependencies in tests ... OK
* checking tests ...
Running ?AitchisonTest.R?
Running ?CheckGeometry.R? [38s/38s]
Running ?RobustTest.R?
Running ?TestMissing.R? [39s/40s]
Running ?TestSimp.R? [12s/12s]
Running ?acheck.R?
Running ?geostat.R?
Running ?missings.R?
Running ?quickcheck.R?
OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
WARNING: There was 1 warning.
NOTE: There was 1 note.
See
?/tmp/compositions.Rcheck/00check.log?
for details.
--
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science Assoc. Di...