search for: acefekay

Basicly read: http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2010/01/03/the-dc-locator-process-the-logon-process-controlling-which-dc-responds-in-an-ad-site-and-srv-records/ https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc787370(WS.10).aspx ( you can set the registry changes in the GPO ) now check this very handy site. https://www.windows-security.org/75...

...hement (I saw a workstation on site A, authenticated on DC of site A (alive), fetching GPO from site B, no matter the configuration). To me it seems to be related to the lack of DFS handling Regards Le 08/04/2016 10:20, L.P.H. van Belle a écrit : > Basicly read: > http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2010/01/03/the-dc-locator-process-the-logon-process-controlling-which-dc-responds-in-an-ad-site-and-srv-records/ > > https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc787370(WS.10).aspx > ( you can set the registry changes in the GPO ) > > now check this very handy site. > https://www...

On 31/01/2020 18:15, Kris Lou via samba wrote: > Here is another link (with a set of links in the article, sorry): > https://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2010/01/03/the-dc-locator-process-the-logon-process-controlling-which-dc-responds-in-an-ad-site-and-srv-records/ > > > I particularly like the Summary graphic about 20% down: Thanks Kris. -- Paul Littlefield Telephone: 07801 125705 Email: info at paully.co.uk Wiki: http://wiki.indie...

..., is it replicated to the Win DC? Yes * Does the behaviour changes, if you temporary shutdown Samba on the first DC while you create the record? no * Who build the domain? I mean: Who was first and populated the AD? Windows or Samba? samba We might be facing this problem: http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2012/06/20/steps-taken-to-resolve-an-issue-with-corrupted-application-partitions-specifically-dns-partitions-and-their-crossref-erence-objects-in-the-ad-configuration-container/ dcdiag /test:dns Throws some errors.... I'll collect some logs and screenshots. Regards, Dominik Hello Marc, &...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I like to know what will happend if: - - one Domain with 2 DCs - - two Admins working on their Windows-ws with RSAT. - - Admin1 is connected to DC1 - - Admin2 is connected to DC2 - - Admin1 creats a user "u1" and a group "g1" - - then the two DCs will lose connection, the user and group is replicated to DC2 - - now Admin1

Hi list, I recently realized that using multiple DC has a major drawback when using Samba In my understanding, in a classical AD environment, sysvol share is supposed to be a DFS share. This means that proximity rules are applied when accessing to it. When using samba it seems that we face a classical round-robin DNS, which can lead to the situation where a machine on site A tries to fetch

@L.P.H. this config looks more simple than https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 do you update via DHCP? @Rowland thanks for the link. I have try dns/dhcp updates after the change of auth-nxdomain yes; does not show the result I want to see. Sorry for this inconvenience. I will try it tomorrow. In the link you post a can read "don't forget to

.../active-directory/18697-ad-zones-and-dns-soa-records > > > and > > http://www.dell.com/support/article/us/en/19/SLN156678/en > > Both state that each DC should have it's own SOA if it's directory > integrated. However looking here > > http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2013/04/30/dns-zone-types-explained-and-their-significance-in-active-directory/ > > > says that the SOA should rotate Hi, thanks for that, but I am fairly sure I have already seen them, or others just like them, the problem is that windows is a point & click OS and that is all I h...

....com/forums/forum/microsoft-networking-services/active-directory/18697-ad-zones-and-dns-soa-records and http://www.dell.com/support/article/us/en/19/SLN156678/en Both state that each DC should have it's own SOA if it's directory integrated. However looking here http://blogs.msmvps.com/acefekay/2013/04/30/dns-zone-types-explained-and-their-significance-in-active-directory/ says that the SOA should rotate. -- -James

On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: > > On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: > > On 11/27/2015 9:16 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On 27/11/15 13:23, James wrote: > > On 11/26/2015 11:12