search for: accoutn

Hi, Actually on my setup all outgoing calls are going trhu a SIP unique account A have a second SIP account with another operator and I would like my setup to use alternatively each of the two accoutns Call 1=> Dial SIP/phone1 Call 2=> Dial SIP/phone2 Call 3=> Dial SIP/phone1 <...> If you have an sample please let me know

Hi, in our setup, we have two SMTP servers: - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for delivery) - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as outgoing SMTP server) Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any domain to their accounts (for example, if someone will add gmail.com and create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete safe because we will never deliver mail for gmai...

Samba PDC is up and running. We are not using roaming profiles. My problem is this. How do we make the administrator account have administrative priv's locally on the client PC when they login on the DOMAIN? What is happening now is that when the Administrator logs in it just makes a domain accoutn for the Administrator locally but this new account does not have actualy administrator permissions. I read about the netgroup tool and its uses but from what I read this is new to 3.0? We are using smb 2.2.8a. Does anyone have any ideas or know the solution? My thanks..and I hope you all had a...

I have upgraded to samba 3 and having big problems with being unable to set different guest accoutn for each share i have. I use share security and want to have a different guest account for each share. For example, one share contains web data and another contains file exchange data, so the first share must have guest account apache and another one is pcguest. I tried settibfg different 'gu...

...n our setup, we have two SMTP servers: > - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for > delivery) > - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as > outgoing SMTP server) > > Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns > etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - > with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any domain to > their accounts (for example, if someone will add gmail.com and > create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete safe because we will > ne...

...gt;> ?- one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for >>> delivery) >>> ?- one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as >>> outgoing SMTP server) >>> >>> Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns >>> etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - >>> with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any domain to >>> their accounts (for example, if someone will add gmail.com and >>> create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete sa...

...the memory address of the constant instead of > loading the constant :p. Basically what seems to be missing is some > method that returns the parent-instruction of a Use. You can use Use::getUser(), which returns a User (from which Instruction and LoadInst derive). Note that you will have to accoutn for other uses than Loads (such as the initializers of other globals), but in those cases your transformation can probably not proceed anyway. > Does an invokation of a JIT through runFunction() perform any > optimization(s) by itself? I don't thinks so, not sure. > Is there a way t...

Hi, I am trying to replace a global variable with a constant. I did manage to do it, but somehow it appears to be fairly bruteforce by just iterating over all functions/bblocks/instructions and filtering for those that load the variable and replacing the instruction with Instruction::replaceAllUsesWith(). The more intuitive way of iterating over the uses of the variable did not work out as I

...use different SMTP server Hi, in our setup, we have two SMTP servers: - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for delivery) - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as outgoing SMTP server) Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any domain to their accounts (for example, if someone will add gmail.com and create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete safe because we will never deliver mail for gmail.com loca...

...wo SMTP servers: >> - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for >> delivery) >> - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as >> outgoing SMTP server) >> >> Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns >> etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - >> with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any domain to >> their accounts (for example, if someone will add gmail.com and >> create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete safe because w...

...is one is using Dovecot's LMTP >>>> for delivery) >>>> ?- one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as >>>> outgoing SMTP server) >>>> >>>> Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail >>>> accoutns etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for >>>> delivery - with this setup, we can allow to our users to add any >>>> domain to their accounts (for example, if someone will add >>>> gmail.com and create e-mail accounts on it, it's complete s...

...ant instead of >> loading the constant :p. Basically what seems to be missing is some >> method that returns the parent-instruction of a Use. >> > You can use Use::getUser(), which returns a User (from which Instruction and > LoadInst derive). Note that you will have to accoutn for other uses than Loads > (such as the initializers of other globals), but in those cases your > transformation can probably not proceed anyway. > > >> Does an invokation of a JIT through runFunction() perform any >> optimization(s) by itself? >> > I don&...

...to an email adres on this mailserver I get this error: status=bounced (Command died with signal 11: "/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver". The folders where the email should be delivered are created so it does not look like a permission problem. I connect to a mysql database where the email accoutn info is stored, this works. I use the same setup on an ubuntu 8.04 server with dovecot 1 and I have no problems on that server. What am I overlooking here? Here is my configuration: dovecot -n: base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/ log_path: /var/log/mail.log log_timestamp: %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S protocol...

...ails, but I am not sure why. Administrator is a proper username, and it logs into the domain no problem. It is almost like the NT password is not correct, this happens for any account I use, same error. I have marked the failure location below I am able to log into the machine using the domain accoutn and password no problem Any ideas? Thanks Chris SAMBA LOG: [2003/12/09 14:02:51, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2302) lp_file_list_changed() file /etc/samba/smb.conf -> /etc/samba/smb.conf last mod_time: Tue Dec 9 13:52:49 2003 [2003/12/09 14:02:51, 5] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ld...

I have a working sortable_list that is added to by AJAX. The problem is that when a new item is added, it''s not sortable. I found a post on scriptaculous using behaviour.js to refresh the DOM when an item is added, but I can''t figure out how to do it with Rails. To test the behaviour method, I used this: var myrules={ ''div#steps ul'' :

...N: 2003102920:37:21Z#0x0001#0#0000 - - replace: modifiersName modifiersName: cn=samba,dc=domain,dc=de - - replace: modifyTimestamp modifyTimestamp: 20031029203721Z - - - ---- these entries come up every 15 mins. !!!! for every windows domain member! but it seems, that the password hashes for these accoutns haven't changed. okay, i think that these timestamps are relevant, but isn't it cheaper to use 'replace: ...' than 'add: ....' and one step later 'delete: ....' i mentioned, due to my own fault, that using samba-3.0.0 on a BDC/LDAP replica with an write-enabled acc...

...> > Jea philippe a ?crit : > > Hi, > > > > Actually on my setup all outgoing calls are going trhu a SIP unique > > account > > A have a second SIP account with another operator and I would like my > > setup > > to use alternatively each of the two accoutns > > > > Call 1=> Dial SIP/phone1 > > Call 2=> Dial SIP/phone2 > > Call 3=> Dial SIP/phone1 > > <...> > > > > If you have an sample please let me know > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun...