search for: accompli

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "accompli".

2006 Mar 01
3
Samples files for comboot and default
Hi Does subject exist? Is it possible to get MAC address, video card, RAM and the storage of a harddrive by using comboot? And can some one help me? /Kenneth
2017 Apr 10
2
OT: systemd Poll
...> simplicity systemd's service files without fuss. >>> >>> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you >>> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to >>> it? >>> >> Accepting it as a fait accompli. It makes life much harder for no >> obvious gain, but short of creating one's own distro we seem to be stuck >> with it. To answer your question, a combination of proposition 1 and >> the first part of proposition 3. >> >> For those of us with (in my case) over...
2017 Apr 09
0
OT: systemd Poll
...at I launched via inittab. As such, I welcomed the > simplicity systemd's service files without fuss. > > So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you > still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? > Accepting it as a fait accompli. It makes life much harder for no obvious gain, but short of creating one's own distro we seem to be stuck with it. To answer your question, a combination of proposition 1 and the first part of proposition 3. For those of us with (in my case) over 30 years in the industry, reading init scrip...
2017 Apr 10
0
OT: systemd Poll
...ab. As such, I welcomed the >> simplicity systemd's service files without fuss. >> >> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you >> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it? >> > Accepting it as a fait accompli. It makes life much harder for no > obvious gain, but short of creating one's own distro we seem to be stuck > with it. To answer your question, a combination of proposition 1 and > the first part of proposition 3. > > For those of us with (in my case) over 30 years in the indu...
2017 Apr 09
22
OT: systemd Poll
According to "Arthur Schopenhauer": "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." I must admit that I skipped through the first and second stages - I never found creating init scripts a joy and instead opted to write my own scripts that I launched via inittab. As
2020 Nov 17
3
Notes from GitHub Pull Requests round table
I saw some other posts on this list about notes from the round tables at the conference. Did anyone take some for the GitHub round table? Thanks! -- Keith Smiley -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201116/449e0980/attachment.html>
2007 Jun 01
1
NUT Documentation project
[was: Asking hard questions about the NUT architecture] Hy Eric, 2007/5/31, Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com>: > Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>: > > doc definitely! > > As mentioned earlier, I've tried several times to start a full > > rewrite, using docbook, to produce a friendly and complete html doc. > > But the facts are that the doc
2017 Jun 07
2
C7, systemd, say what?!
On 06/07/2017 02:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 6/7/2017 11:28 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> In the case of CentOS-7 .. you don't need to create a whole new >>> distro, you can just petition the CentOS Project Board to create a >>> Special Interest Group to get access to CentOS Project controlled >>> resources to build packages (and get them rolled
2004 Dec 15
7
[proposal] Samba Software Foundation
dear samba users and developers, i'd like to put to you a proposal for your respectful consideration: it is an idea that i believe has strategic merit for the open source community and OS users as a whole. these words are chosen carefully and the reasons will become apparent later: that i begin as an example. as you are no doubt aware, there have been some seriously damaging (but not
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> writes: > >> I'm going to briefly summarize my responses here. >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >>>> Anyways, if
2011 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> writes: > I'm going to briefly summarize my responses here. > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> On Oct 28, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >>> Anyways, if you wish to avoid duplicating info on both Makefile and >>> CMakeLists.txt there is a simple
2019 Nov 18
30
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with