search for: accesssoftek

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 221 matches for "accesssoftek".

2018 Feb 07
2
Current PGO status
...h -fprofile-use. This option turns on > more precise cost model when computing rotation strategy but it is not > turned on by default. > > +carrot who is working on this area. > > thanks, > > David > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Victor Leschuk > <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com <mailto:vleschuk at accesssoftek.com>> wrote: > > Hello David, thanks for detailed response! > > Do you have any tests that you use to measure the PGO > effectiveness? I have tested clang version 6.0 with the same > sample that Jie Chen used in 2016 an...
2018 Feb 07
0
Current PGO status
Victor, please file a bug tracking the issue. We can put relevant information there including test cases used in the experiment etc. thanks, David On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Victor Leschuk <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > David, could you please clarify on which code did you gain 10% > improvement? I have run numerous tests with and w/o this option and it > looks like it has no effect on performance (I am talking of the old 2016 > sample to be concrete). Maybe we could investigate i...
2020 Sep 15
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: Simulation of load-store forwarding with MI scheduler on AArch64
...uctions can be forwarded from the beginning of the wr pipeline stage to either the load or store AGU base operand” However nothing is said about pre/post indexed forms. From: Andrew Trick<mailto:atrick at apple.com> Sent: 15 сентября 2020 г. 7:04 To: Evgeny Leviant<mailto:eleviant at accesssoftek.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [llvm-dev] Simulation of load-store forwarding with MI scheduler on AArch64 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you rec...
2017 Dec 16
3
[RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
...laikie at gmail.com> Отправлено: 16 декабря 2017 г. 22:25 Кому: George Rimar Копия: Sean Silva; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Rui Ueyama; Rafael Espindola Тема: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD). On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com<mailto:grimar at accesssoftek.com>> wrote: >Wasn't our (lld/ELF's) position on debug info size that we should focus on providing a great split-dwarf workflow and not try go too far out of our way to deduplicate >or otherwise reduce debug info size inside LLD? I recal...
2020 Oct 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:48 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Thanks, David! > > > Few minor additions to the topic: > > > > I'm not sure which MSVC version on godbolt would be "MSVC 2017" that > the LLVM docs refer to > > > I've found that the minimal available version of MSVC on > go...
2018 Feb 06
2
Current PGO status
...ve any idea what can be wrong? Maybe there are some recommendations in which cases one should use PGO with clang and when it is better not to do it? Thanks! On 02/05/2018 09:38 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Victor Leschuk > <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com <mailto:vleschuk at accesssoftek.com>> wrote: > > Hello David! > > I have recently started acquaintance with PGO in LLVM/clang and found > your e-mail thread: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099395.html &...
2019 Jan 02
2
[HWASAN] Is Buildbot missing hwasan tests?
...s/18677 Is there a hole in our testing? Anyone else seeing this failure? Any idea of the cause? "hwasan_memset" doesn't appear anywhere in compiler-rt's history, but it shows up in LLVM: commit 631b5bc6125d979804e3e563935a93e2577e617c Author: Eugene Leviant <eleviant at accesssoftek.com> Date: Thu Dec 20 09:04:33 2018 +0000 [HWASAN] Add support for memory intrinsics Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55117 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 349728 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6...
2019 Jan 02
3
[HWASAN] Is Buildbot missing hwasan tests?
This commit has added __hwasan_memset to compiler-rt: commit 749bd83b08b7239f5d18c4e3095183919c68eb30 Author: Eugene Leviant <eleviant at accesssoftek.com> Date: Thu Dec 20 09:10:03 2018 +0000 [HWASAN] Add support for memory intrinsics This is patch complements D55117 implementing __hwasan_mem* functions in runtime Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55554 Notes: git-svn-rev: 349730 We run hw...
2018 Feb 06
0
Current PGO status
...se-rotation-cost and there is about 10% speedup with -fprofile-use. This option turns on more precise cost model when computing rotation strategy but it is not turned on by default. +carrot who is working on this area. thanks, David On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Victor Leschuk <vleschuk at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello David, thanks for detailed response! > > Do you have any tests that you use to measure the PGO effectiveness? I > have tested clang version 6.0 with the same sample that Jie Chen used in > 2016 and actually both frontend-based PGO and IR-based make code run &g...
2018 Feb 09
2
Collecting address ranges in DWARFUnit::collectAddressRanges.
...aul; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Rafael Avila de Espindola Тема: Re: [llvm-dev] Collecting address ranges in DWARFUnit::collectAddressRanges. Nah, doesn't look like it. Removed it (& the place I copied it from) in: r324738 Thanks! On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:28 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com<mailto:grimar at accesssoftek.com>> wrote: >Totally fair call, sorry it took me a while to come back around to this - added in r324702 Thanks ! Have a question: does it need "requres shell" ? I tried without and it worked for me under windows (had to change check to CHEC...
2020 Oct 02
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
Yeah, not sure either. The discussion about minimum compatibility usually comes down to what version is available on long-term OS releases. On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 12:38 PM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > Is the code currently broken? > > > I don't know. Perhaps the code is fine, I did not try to compile LLVM > with all that compilers > > that we claim as supported though. I just *guess* that we don't have a > bot that builds LLVM with Clang 3....
2018 Jul 12
2
debug_rnglists status
...retty much every other DWARF section. If you have other goals, let us know what they are. Thanks, --paulr > -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of via > llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:08 PM > To: vleschuk at accesssoftek.com; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] debug_rnglists status > > Hi Victor! > > I am just about to commit https://reviews.llvm.org/D49214, the first > implementation of .debug_rnglists. As you can probably see from the review > it generates the...
2020 Oct 01
2
[EXTERNAL] Re: preferred way to return expected values
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:08 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > FWIW, I've performed an experiment with the code below at godbolt. > (used -O2, https://godbolt.org/z/nY95nh) > > ``` > #include <vector> > #include "llvm/Support/Error.h" > > llvm::Expected<std::vector<int&...
2020 Feb 04
2
RFC: Add a preprocessor to yaml2obj (and other YAML tools)
...: Add a preprocessor to yaml2obj (and other YAML tools) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you suspect potential phishing or spam email, report it to ReportSpam at accesssoftek.com As someone who suggested this kind of functionality in a review earlier, this will certainly be useful, I think. I think the syntax makes sense to me, if we allow for unrecognised macros to just be treated as part of the input string. This means we don't have to worry about complexities lik...
2015 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] [lld] Undefined symbols postprocessing
...linking of the executable? - Denis. On 02/24/2015 06:44 AM, Nick Kledzik wrote: On Feb 23, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com><mailto:bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Denis Protivensky > <dprotivensky at accesssoftek.com><mailto:dprotivensky at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >> Shankar, >> >> Okay, I guessed the correct interface. >> But what about the moment at which the function is called? >> If it's called from Resolver::resolve(), it doesn't make any difference to &g...
2016 Jan 20
2
Bug 26222 - [ELF] wrong functions are called when linking against DSO
?Hi, I found a new issue in lld (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26222), but after review of outputs internals still have no idea why that can happen. Do you have any thoughts about possible reasons of that ? I am going to continue investigating that tomorrow. Best regards, George. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Mar 22
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > >I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these > features with lld. > > > >Cheers, > >Rafael > > Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the > object?​ > > ​Best regards, > George | Develop...
2017 Aug 06
2
Staging buildmaster down?
Hey all, It seems that the main buildmaster here is working fine http://lab.llvm.org:8011/ However, I have a 'connection refused' error whilst connecting to the staging buildmaster http://lab.llvm.org:8014/ Are you aware of this Victor and Galina? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Feb 09
0
Collecting address ranges in DWARFUnit::collectAddressRanges.
Nah, doesn't look like it. Removed it (& the place I copied it from) in: r324738 Thanks! On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:28 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > >Totally fair call, sorry it took me a while to come back around to this - > added in r324702 > > Thanks ! Have a question: does it need "requres shell" ? > I tried without and it worked for me under windows (had to change check > to CHECK: .{{\\|...
2018 Mar 21
2
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld. > >Cheers, >Rafael Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object?? ?Best regards, George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: