search for: accesses_out

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "accesses_out".

Did you mean: accesses_outer
2020 Jun 24
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > As mentioned in the Differential, generating the tests automatically > > will lose information about what actually is intended to be tested, > > Agreed - and I didn't mean to suggest tests should be automatically > generated. I work pretty hard in code reviews to encourage tests to
2020 Jul 01
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...!{} >     75 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_INNER]] = distinct !{![[LOOP_INNER]], > ![[ACCESSES_INNER:[0-9]+]]} >     76 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESSES_INNER]] = > !{!"llvm.loop.parallel_accesses", ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]]} >     77 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_OUTER]] = distinct !{![[LOOP_OUTER]], > ![[ACCESSES_OUTER:[0-9]+]]} >     78 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESSES_OUTER]] = > !{!"llvm.loop.parallel_accesses", ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]]} > > And the output of `FileCheck --dump-input -v` is: > >          38: !0 = !{!1} >          39: !1 = distinct !{!1, !2, !"callee: %A"} >    ...
2020 Jul 01
5
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...[[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]] = distinct !{} 75 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_INNER]] = distinct !{![[LOOP_INNER]], ![[ACCESSES_INNER:[0-9]+]]} 76 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESSES_INNER]] = !{!"llvm.loop.parallel_accesses", ![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER]]} 77 ; CHECK: ![[LOOP_OUTER]] = distinct !{![[LOOP_OUTER]], ![[ACCESSES_OUTER:[0-9]+]]} 78 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESSES_OUTER]] = !{!"llvm.loop.parallel_accesses", ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER]]} And the output of `FileCheck --dump-input -v` is: 38: !0 = !{!1} 39: !1 = distinct !{!1, !2, !"callee: %A"} 40: !2 = distinct !{!2, !"ca...