Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "accessbl".
Did you mean:
accessble
2006 Jul 02
4
is "label for" better?
I''ve noticed that it is common practise in forms to use:
<label for="tablename","columnname"> ...Some column name</label>
Why is the above construct better than just writting it this way?
<label> Some column name</label>
If there is not compelling reason, I''d prefer to use the second example and
save on typing.
--
Best Regards,
2011 Oct 19
0
glusterFS
...l,
I like to know whether my requirments can done though glusterFS or not.
Please help me to proceed further if not let me know the suitable way for
that.
I have a RAID server and two RHEL-6 servers. I like to have/configure
Clustered node on RAID server.That means Files on RAID server should be
accessble on both the clustred nodes.
I have been advised to use GFS for this purpose.But I like to know is it
possible through glusterFS? If so help me to Configure So.
Thanks & regards,
Ramesh Kumar.G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercol...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...ba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
In our network we have one SAMBA server wich works perfectly! It's connected
to clients over two hubs (two offices in different rooms). But now we
changet one HUB with a SWITCH and in this room samba isn't accessble any
more. Is there any way to work out this problem ? We assume that new switch
is causing all the troubles but we do not want to replace it. It's a 24 port
SWITCH and takes a lot of burden off the rest of the network. Thanks for any
answer,
Marko
ANNI rahunalni9ke storitve d.o.o.
Poduti9ka...