Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "access_group_list_3".
2020 Jun 24
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>:
> > As mentioned in the Differential, generating the tests automatically
> > will lose information about what actually is intended to be tested,
>
> Agreed - and I didn't mean to suggest tests should be automatically
> generated. I work pretty hard in code reviews to encourage tests to
2020 Jul 01
5
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...annotating the `!7 = ...` line repeatedly? Why not pointing to the lines where ACCESSES_INNER/ACCESS_GROUP_INNER have their values from?)
The CHECK lines, annotated with their line numbers from parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are:
68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]]
69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]]
70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]
71
72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] = !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]}
73 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_...
2020 Jul 01
6
[RFC] Compiled regression tests.
...Why
> not pointing to the lines where ACCESSES_INNER/ACCESS_GROUP_INNER have
> their values from?)
>
> The CHECK lines, annotated with their line numbers from
> parallel-loop-md-merge.ll, are:
>
> 68 ; CHECK: store double 4.200000e+01, {{.*}} !llvm.access.group
> ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3:[0-9]+]]
> 69 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond.i, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_INNER:[0-9]+]]
> 70 ; CHECK: br label %for.cond, !llvm.loop ![[LOOP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]
> 71
> 72 ; CHECK: ![[ACCESS_GROUP_LIST_3]] =
> !{![[ACCESS_GROUP_INNER:[0-9]+]], ![[ACCESS_GROUP_OUTER:[0-9]+]]}
> ...