search for: acces

...? ? ? ? } > ? ? }) > } > > The?factorial_tr_manual function is how I would implement the function manually while?factorial_tr_automatic_1 is what my package used to come up with. It handles non-local returns, because this is something I need in general. Finally,?factorial_tr_automatic_2 accesses the local variables explicitly through the environment, which is what my package currently produces. > > The difference between supporting non-local returns and not is tiny, but explicitly accessing variables through their environment costs me about a factor of five ? something that surpri...

...; } > > > > The factorial_tr_manual function is how I would implement the function > manually while factorial_tr_automatic_1 is what my package used to come up > with. It handles non-local returns, because this is something I need in > general. Finally, factorial_tr_automatic_2 accesses the local variables > explicitly through the environment, which is what my package currently > produces. > > > > The difference between supporting non-local returns and not is tiny, but > explicitly accessing variables through their environment costs me about a > factor o...

...{ force(acc) cases(lst, NIL -> acc, CONS(car, cdr) -> list_length(cdr, acc + 1)) } The `cases` function creates an environment that binds variables in a pattern-description that over-scopes the expression to the right of `->`, so the recursive call in this example have access to the variables `cdr` and `car`. I can transform a `cases` call to one that creates the environment containing the bound variables and then evaluate this using `eval` or `with`, but in either case, a call to `next` will not work in such a context. The expression will be evaluated inside `bind` o...

..._acc ? ? ? ? ? ? } ? ? ? ? } ? ? }) } The?factorial_tr_manual function is how I would implement the function manually while?factorial_tr_automatic_1 is what my package used to come up with. It handles non-local returns, because this is something I need in general. Finally,?factorial_tr_automatic_2 accesses the local variables explicitly through the environment, which is what my package currently produces. The difference between supporting non-local returns and not is tiny, but explicitly accessing variables through their environment costs me about a factor of five ? something that surprised me....

It looks like rsync 2.5.4 vs 26 has a bug when the target file is backed up with a suffix. For a large 1 GB file transfer, an error "redoing" appeared in the debug. In other words, when you see redoing in your debug expect the backup not to have worked correctly. I didn't see this problem btwn naxpap01 and rwxp25l1 just btwn rwxp25l1 and naxp18l1. I'm pulling the code from

Hi I never seen this before, and dont understand where too look for Please share some light on this. the host output is adding a extra domain. example bellow, its showing right IPs followed by NXDOMAIN !!! [root at 171-SYSLOG ~]# host 171-dc-a.xxxx.acc 171-dc-a.test.acc has address 10.254.228.226 171-dc-a.test.acc has address 10.254.225.45 Host 171-dc-a.test.acc not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Host

I have load / store instructions that require accumulator. So a store looks like.. mov 3, acc st acc, addr I have specified "acc" as a separate register class containing only one register which is the "acc". The instr patterns are then splitted into: set imm:$src, ACCClass:$dst (generating the "mov" above) set ACCClass:$src, mem:$dst (generating the

Hello all... I am just starting to teach myself Bayesian methods, and am interested in learning how to use UMacs. I've read the documentation, but the single example is a bit over my head at the level I am at right now. I was wondering if anyone has any simple examples they'd like to share. I've successfully done a couple of simple gibbs examples, but have had a hard time

...lst, > NIL -> acc, > CONS(car, cdr) -> list_length(cdr, acc + 1)) > } > > The `cases` function creates an environment that binds variables in a pattern-description that over-scopes the expression to the right of `->`, so the recursive call in this example have access to the variables `cdr` and `car`. > > I can transform a `cases` call to one that creates the environment containing the bound variables and then evaluate this using `eval` or `with`, but in either case, a call to `next` will not work in such a context. The expression will be evaluated insid...

Hi, i have a problem in assigning 2 conditions to grep() , my data look like this: DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 20 Sac= 0.93 Acc= 4.76 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 14 Sac= 0.65 Acc= 3.33 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac= 0.14 Acc= 0.71 DA 24 N7 Rad= 3.4 11 Sac= 0.51 Acc= 2.62 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 8 Sac= 0.37 Acc= 1.91 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 5 Sac= 0.23 Acc= 1.19 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 0 Sac= 0.00 Acc= 0.00 DG 23 N7 Rad= 3.4 3 Sac=

...> > > When I use the GPRRegs, which has more regs, the code is ok. > is it because I still haven't implemented the stack/frame related > routines and the value in acc is getting spilled to stack and > reloaded? It's very hard to tell what's going on without having access to your backend. If you dump out the machineinstrs just before register allocation and again after allocation but before spiller rewrite (VirtRegMap.cpp), it might be easier to see where things started going wrong. Evan > > > _______________________________________________ >...

...; NIL -> acc, > CONS(car, cdr) -> list_length(cdr, acc + 1)) } > > The `cases` function creates an environment that binds variables in a pattern- > description that over-scopes the expression to the right of `->`, so the recursive > call in this example have access to the variables `cdr` and `car`. > > I can transform a `cases` call to one that creates the environment containing the > bound variables and then evaluate this using `eval` or `with`, but in either case, > a call to `next` will not work in such a context. The expression will be evalu...

Dear all, I installed "dovecot dovecoot-mysql postfix and postfix-mysql" from debian repository 7. I start them with "/etc/init.d/postfix start" and "/etc/init.d/dovecot start" but When i use nmap localhost I see the following output: root at sito:/etc/dovecot# nmap localhost Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2013-09-12 07:35 IRDT Nmap scan report for

If we use the ROCR package to find the accuracy of a classifier pred <- prediction(svm.pred, testset[,2]) perf.acc <- performance(pred,"acc") Do we?find the maximum accuracy?as follows?(is there a simplier way?): > max(perf.acc at x.values[[1]]) Then to find the cutoff point that maximizes the accuracy?do we do the following?(is there a simpler way): > cutoff.list <-

Forgive the newbie question, I want to select random rows from my data.frame to create a test set (which I can do) but then I want to create a training set using whats left over. Example code: acc <- read.table("accOUT.txt", header=T, sep = ",", row.names=1) #select 400 random rows in data training <- acc[sample(1:nrow(acc), 400, replace=TRUE),] #try to get whats left

I have a list of data frames like this: a<- data.frame(x=runif(10), y = runif(10), Acc = 1) b<- data.frame(x=runif(10), y = runif(10), Acc = 0) ls<- list(a,b) and I want to remove the data frames from ls that have Acc values other than 1. How do I do that? Thanks for any help! Matthew

Hi Freinds, I have two data frames X,Y. I want to append both the data frames into one, along with the columns names from both the data frames (it should look like Z). X: Summary G Y R Acc 12 12 13 Bcc 11 14 15 Ccc 13 15 16 Y: Summary G Y R Acc 10 11 12 Bcc

Hello, The last weekend, the VM with CentOS 7 (kernel-3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64) was running with 2.5GB of used memory, but without users connected, and heavy services running. Three minutes after reboot, the o.s. is running with 114MB used. ?Why the 62% of memory is used if the o.s. does not have an intensive load? top sorted by memory: top - 12:55:34 up 8 days, 21:41, 1 user, load

So I've been designing an experimental 6502 backend for LLVM. Link: <https://github.com/beholdnec/llvm-m6502> The 6502 only has a few registers, one accumulator and two indexes, none of which are large enough to hold an absolute pointer. Because of this, the backend really tests the power of LLVM's register allocator (RA). I've made a change to the RA that might be of interest

Here's the output: Feb 9 15:51:26 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0f:ea:73:88:12:00:40:2b:67:5b:a7:08:00 SRC=192.168.1.54 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=128 ID=51248 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1964 DPT=139 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) Feb 9 15:51:28 SSI001 kernel: SFW2-INext-ACC-TCP IN=eth0 OUT=