search for: accept_client

...open files. I read some posts about the 1024 fd limit but this is not the case. My stations rarely has 300 listeners. From the log I can see that around 3PM I had 7 listeners on a mount and 35 on another one. Then, suddenly the only line written to the log is [2013-02-13 15:59:06] WARN connection/accept_client accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files After some hours I found out about this issue and had to kill icecast. The stop command didn't work. This is the only time this happened. If it were about the number of listerners they would have showed up in the log... So...could have been an...

For anyone that has experienced the odd End of file or Cannot describe errors, we''ve found that switching to Mongrel has fixed this problem for us. We''re currently running 5 instance of puppetmaster under mongrel (with the apache proxy in front) and things are going great. For more information on setting up Mongrel, visit:

...1024 fd limit but this is not the case. My > > stations rarely has 300 listeners. From the log I can see that around > > 3PM I had 7 listeners on a mount and 35 on another one. Then, suddenly > > the only line written to the log is > > [2013-02-13 15:59:06] WARN connection/accept_client accept() failed > > with error 24: Too many open files > > After some hours I found out about this issue and had to kill icecast. > > The stop command didn't work. This is the only time this happened. > > If it were about the number of listerners they would have showed u...

...some posts about the 1024 fd limit but this is not the case. My > stations rarely has 300 listeners. From the log I can see that around > 3PM I had 7 listeners on a mount and 35 on another one. Then, suddenly > the only line written to the log is > [2013-02-13 15:59:06] WARN connection/accept_client accept() failed > with error 24: Too many open files > After some hours I found out about this issue and had to kill icecast. > The stop command didn't work. This is the only time this happened. > If it were about the number of listerners they would have showed up in > the log......