Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "ac_type_long_double_wid".
Did you mean:
ac_type_long_double_wider
2015 Jun 28
2
[Bug 11369] New: obsoleted autoconf macros
..., it's my understanding that instead of
having it return RETSIGTYPE and having autoconf determine the type, it can just
be void and remove the check. The defined token seems to only occur in rsync.c
and main.c.
The second item is AC_C_LONG_DOUBLE which is replaced by AC_TYPE_LONG_DOUBLE
and/or AC_TYPE_LONG_DOUBLE_WIDER. By their assessment, currently available
compilers do indeed have long double types without needing to check for them.
What may need checked is whether that long double type is wider than a double
using AC_TYPE_LONG_DOUBLE_WIDER. The libs/snprintf.c file is the only one
affected by the header de...