search for: ac7ea4b1

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>wrote: > >> > >> > #4 is interesting, but a *ton* of work. The Object library, most of >> Support >> > and System, all would have to sink into this core module, all would >> have to

...he attribution requirement, and we should be able to have the license issues fixed prior to the next LLVM release so it doesn't have to be permanent. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120601/ac7ea4b1/attachment.html>

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > #4 is interesting, but a *ton* of work. The Object library, most of > Support > > and System, all would have to sink into this core module, all would have > to > > get dual-licensed (ow!!! how? some of the contributors are around to > agree > > to new license, but