Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "ac6e3b63".
2012 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
Hello
> The prologue length in .debug_line is 157 for clang generated one, whereas
> it is 34 for gcc generated one. I am curious about the results of making
> prologue generated by clang look similar with one generated by gcc.
> Could anyone let me know why this difference exists and if it is for good
> /better purposes than for gcc. ?
1. This is not function prologue length.
2012 Feb 16
3
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
...he stuff clear.
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120217/ac6e3b63/attachment.html>
2012 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] difference in function prologue generated with clang and gcc
1.
I would like to know why there is a difference in function prologue
generated for same function with clang and gcc.
Compiler options used for gcc were as follows:
arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc all-types.c -w -march=armv7-a
-mtune=cortex-a8 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfp -g -lm -o all-types_gcc
Compiler options used for clang were as follows:
/usr/local/bin/clang all-types.c -w