search for: ac5

Hello, I am going to set up a new file server ("smb" and "nfs") machine for the local network of my former school. Therefore I've just downloaded and successfully compiled "linux-2.4.9-ac5" (including "disk quota support" and, of course, support for "ext3 file system"). I've read the statement: | ... | | The quota code in the -ac kernels is very different, and once that gets | merged into Linus' tree we shall continue development and testing of...

I've updated today the version of ext3 on my laptop (from 0.9.3 to 0.9.4) and I am unable to boot anymore (hand copy below): VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized Journalling Block Device driver loaded Invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c01256bf>] ... ... ... Kernel panic: attempted to kill init. Since this is my / fs, I am unable to boot anymore (and of course

...://luxik.cdi.cz/~patrick/imq/ iptables and kernel modules compiled and loaded successfully But after run last line /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0.9 -j IMQ I got kernel crush and register stack I can''t save it because kernel frezze O, my kernel is Linux watcher 2.4.19-pre8-ac5 #2 Wed Jul 10 10:08:55 EEST 2002 i686 unknown May be I do something wrong or any other ideas? -- Best regard, Alexander Trotsai aka MAGE-RIPE aka MAGE-UANIC My PGP at ftp://blackhole.adamant.net/pgp/trotsai.key[.asc] Big trouble - The Borg tried to assimilate your system. Resistance is futile.

...subject to serious performance problems; on the machine that needs 24 minutes to build from a 200-Mb mbox, rebuilding the database from a list of tokens took eight seconds -- this was on ext3 in ordered mode. These data were obtained on machines running linux kernels 2.4.21-pre3-ac4 and -ac5 and 2.4.21-pre4-ac1; kernel 2.4.20-ac2 appears to give similar results though this has not been thorougly tested. Results like those reported were initially obtained with db-3.1.17; the tests shown here used db-4.1.25. More info available on request; tuning hints most gratefully received and test...

Lo, Is there already a patch out for latest 2.4.6-ac release? I'm pretty sure that the ext3 patch -ac2 can not be applied on this release. Bye. -- the trees the birds the air the grass the water the flies the trees

Hello, I have today released an initial version of extended attributes and access control lists for ext3 (patch against the 2.4.13-ac3 kernel). Eric Jarman <ejarman@acm.org> has contributed a lot to this effort. Since I'm not very much into the innards of ext3, can some of you please take a look at the patch, and see whether it contains any flaws (and tell me which flaws)? Thanks! The

...default qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:b0:0a:c5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.0.0.1/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global br2 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 2001:db8:ca2:3::1/64 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::5054:ff:feb0:ac5/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 12: br2-nic: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel master br2 state DOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 52:54:00:b0:0a:c5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff *********** virsh net-list --all shows: Name Sta...

Hello, does anybody know if there is an ext3fs patch for kernel 2.4.2-2 that is shipped with redhat 7.1? I was abel to fins patches only for 2.4.6 and 2.4.7. Please try to help ASAP. Best regards, Imad Ossaily.

..... I tried Fake Oplock with no success.. The _interesting_ thing is that on Novell it had the same problem but the solution was to set the files with the flag SHAREABLE ("flag * sh") ! Now IMHO nothing equal exists on Linux.. so, please could you help me ?? I'm running Linux 2.2.10-ac5, Samba 2.0.4b (from Rawhide) .. btw: I have no problem with more users reading the same file, just with this catalogue program.. thanks in advance! Marek Les

...550 1 GHz P3 1280 MB mem Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100 NIC Internal AACRAID controller with two 18 GB 1000 rpm drives in raid mirror External PERC 3/DC Megaraid controller with two raid 5 arrays consisting of 6 36 GB 1000 rpm drives in each Debian 2.2 with kernel 2.4 updated packages kernel 2.4.13-ac5 samba 2.0.10 reason for 2.0.10 and not 2.2.x samba is that I experienced problems with stabilty running 2.2 during my netbench tests.No problems at all with 2.0.10..Anyone had similar experiences ?? It just performed slow and consumed lots of memory hogging the machine completely.. best regar...

...550 1 GHz P3 1280 MB mem Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100 NIC Internal AACRAID controller with two 18 GB 1000 rpm drives in raid mirror External PERC 3/DC Megaraid controller with two raid 5 arrays consisting of 6 36 GB 1000 rpm drives in each Debian 2.2 with kernel 2.4 updated packages kernel 2.4.13-ac5 samba 2.0.10 reason for 2.0.10 and not 2.2.x samba is that I experienced problems with stabilty running 2.2 during my netbench tests.No problems at all with 2.0.10..Anyone had similar experiences ?? It just performed slow and consumed lots of memory hogging the machine completely.. best regar...

...tors: failed f_swapfs: checking the e2fsck swapfs functionality: failed Also, 2 checks has been skipped: e_brel_bma: block relocation table using the memory array implementation: skipped e_irel_ima: inode relocation table using the memory array implementation: skipped I'm using kernel 2.4.12-ac5, gcc 2.95.2, glibc 2.2 (it's a SuSE 7.1 distribution). I think those failed tests should be resolved but I don't know how and what's the problem behind it. A co-worker tested it on an almost identical machine (identical machine, but Debian installed) and it worked for him. So the proble...

An update to the ext3 filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The diffs are against linux-2.4.7 and linux-2.4.6-ac5. The changelog is there. One rarely-occurring but oopsable bug was fixed and several quite significant performance enhancements have been made. These are in addition to the performance fixes which went into 0.9.3. Ted has put out a prelease of e2fsprogs-1.23 which supports filesystem type `auto...

...ss.. > >The _interesting_ thing is that on Novell it had the same problem but >the solution was to set the files with the flag SHAREABLE ("flag * >sh") ! > >Now IMHO nothing equal exists on Linux.. so, please could you help me >?? > >I'm running Linux 2.2.10-ac5, Samba 2.0.4b (from Rawhide) .. > >btw: I have no problem with more users reading the same file, just >with this catalogue program.. > >thanks in advance! > >Marek Les > > >------------------------------ > >Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:51:18 +0200 >From: Kevi...

...ing the > oplock = false or any other tweaking is needed. I don't know if your "access denied" and "file already open by someone" errors will be solved by setting "oplocks = false". However, I'd like you to know that I'm using Samba 2.2.0 on Linux 2.4.5-ac5 and I do have "oplocks = false". Why did I do this? I migrated to 2.2.0 on a new server when I set it up. The old server as running Samba 2.0.7, also on Linux (kernel 2.2.19) without problems for quite awhile already. My network is composed of mostly Windows 95 OSR2 clients with Microsof...