search for: ac1

...er is better) ====== dbench-1.3 ext3 192 processes Average +/- MB/sec 2.4.20-rc1aa1 79.3 5.3 2.4.19 61.1 1.1 2.4.21-pre4-ac3 60.1 1.7 2.4.20-rc1 60.6 3.2 2.4.21-rc6-ac1 49.9 7.5 2.4.23-rc1 45.4 0.8 2.4.22aa1 40.3 11.2 2.4.18 27.0 0.3 dbench-1.3 ext3 64 processes Averag +/- MB/sec 2.4.20-rc1aa1 102.6 16.0 2...

Does the ext3 patch applies on top of the newly released 2.4.6 kernel (and/or the 2.4.6-ac1 variant) ? I want to upgrade to the new kernel and wanted to know before I run into problems if there are any known problems and if it's better to wait for an 'official' release. Thanks. Stelian. -- Stelian Pop <stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com> |---------------- Free Software Engine...

...th subregisters on my target. With a pseudo that writes to a 32 bit reg: %vreg20<def> = toHi16_low0_pseudo %vreg2; reg32:%vreg20 hi16:%vreg2 expands to %vreg2<def> = COPY %a2h; hi16:%vreg2 %vreg43<def> = mov 0, pred:0, pred:%noreg, %ac0<imp-use>, %ac1<imp-use>; lo16:%vreg43 %vreg20<def> = REG_SEQUENCE %vreg2, hi16, %vreg43, lo16; reg32:%vreg20 hi16:%vreg2 lo16:%vreg43 Becomes 16L %vreg20:hi16<def,undef> = COPY %a2h<kill>, %vreg20<imp-def>; reg32:%vreg20 368L %vreg20:lo16<def> =...

...ck, data = example)) summary(aov(Y ~ Error(Block) + A*C, data = example)) # Significant 2-way interaction. Now we would like to test the effect # of A at C1 and the effect of A at C2. Construct two new variables # that decompose the interaction, so an LRT is possible. example$AC <- example$AC1 <- example$AC2 <- interaction(example$A, example$C) example$AC1[example$C == "C1"] <- "A1.C1" # A is constant at C1 example$AC2[example$C == "C2"] <- "A1.C2" # A is constant at C2 # lme fails (as does lmer) lme(Y ~ AC1 + AC, random = ~ 1 | B...

Hi, After searching the archives and Google and not turning up anything, I thought I'd ask here. Has anyone done an R package for calculating Gwet's AC1 statistic and variance? K.L. Gwet. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008 May;61(Pt 1):29-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482474 Thanks, --pete

I've been using Dovecot on 2.6.0-test1 for quite awhile but today I jumped ahead to test5 and it broke in the way you described. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/list/dovecot/2003-July/001943.html I used your workaround and now everyone is back in business. Thank you for the help! (I was sweating there for a bit.) --kyler

Hi all For various reasons I was looking into 2.6, so I installed a copy on my desktop. Everything works fine, except for dovecot - errors such as this appeared in the syslog: Jul 15 14:41:09 typhaon dovecot: Dovecot starting up Jul 15 14:41:12 typhaon imap-login: setuid(113) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable Jul 15 14:41:12 typhaon dovecot: Login process died too early - shutting down I

Since I ain't got a better place to report this, I do it here: Kernel 2.4.20-ac1 # uptime 16:31:00 up 2 days, 22:10, 7 users, load average: 1.89, 2.20, 2.99 This is our main mailbox server. We're running ext3: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 /dev/sdb5 /boot ext3 rw 0 0 /dev/sda6 /home ext3 rw,noatime,nosuid 0 0...

...48)) { for (m in c(25,50,100)) { for (j in 1:1000) { #### PREPARING CLUSTER LEVEL DATA ###### d1=SimClust(k,m,mu=30,sb2=25,sw2=75,r=0.5,z=0.841621) # for p=0.2 d2=SimClust(k,m,mu=20,sb2=25,sw2=75,r=0.5,z=1.281552) # for p=0.1 ## TREATMENT ## r1 <- cor(d1[,2:3])[1,2] # COST # ac1 <- anova(lm(c~g,d1)) rc1 <- (ac1[1,3]-ac1[2,3])/(ac1[1,3]+(m-1)*ac1[2,3]) if (rc1 < 0) rc1 <- 0 vc1 <- var(d1[,2]) mc1 <- as.vector(by(d1[,2],as.numeric(d1[,1]),mean)) vc1m <- vc1*(1+(m-1)*rc1)/(k*m) # EFFECT # ae1 <- anova(lm(e~g,d1)) re1 <- (ae1...

...h returns me the following warning message: In sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, var.names = vars, : Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. ######### Model ######## mDPDF = data.frame(mj1,mj2,mj3,mj4,mj5,eL1,eL2,eL3,eL4,eL5,aC1,aC2,aC3,aC4,disR1,disR2,disR3,disR4,disR5, difR1,difR2,difR3,difR4,difR5,difR6,dC1,dC2,dC3,dC4,aB1,aB2,aB3,aB4,aB5,deh1,deh2,deh3,deh4) mydata.cov <- cov(mDPDF) model.mydata <- specify.model() MJ -> mj1, NA, 1 MJ -> mj2, lam2, NA MJ -> mj3, lam3, NA MJ -> mj4, lam4, NA MJ -> mj...

Hello list, I have a problem with an NFS server for my network. It has ran kernels 2.4.18-ac4 - 2.4.21-ac1, all with problems. The -ac patches are used to provide the new style quota support. The system seems to have gotten even less stable with the new kernel versions. This morning around 5 am, I got a page the system was unresponding to NFS requests. I ssh'd in, and found the loadavg at ~50....

Good day! I create diagram of encoder process. Using it i create implementation of encoder in FPGA (Xilinx/Altera). Please critique it. Is there missing stages? Here is blog http://developer-fpga.blogspot.com/ Here is picture of encoding stage 1 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-NV8o9DG3jvE/TYjYXr-dYGI/AAAAAAAAAos/U06O-YvhSI0/s1600/stage1.jpg Here is picture of encoding stage 2

...18 Is this even possible? I am using currently using this mail_location: mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u:CONTROL=~/mail/control:INDEX=/var/d ovecot/%u/index:LAYOUT=maildir++ /var/dovecot is on a ssd /var/spool/mail is on sda ~/mail is on sdb with these folders [@mail]# ls -ac1 .folderc .Drafts .foldera control .Trash.folderc .folderb .Sent .Sent.2018 .Trash

I've updated today the version of ext3 on my laptop (from 0.9.3 to 0.9.4) and I am unable to boot anymore (hand copy below): VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized Journalling Block Device driver loaded Invalid operand: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[<c01256bf>] ... ... ... Kernel panic: attempted to kill init. Since this is my / fs, I am unable to boot anymore (and of course

Hi, Is there anything that controls the speed with which pxelinux.0 (4.03) enumerates the files in .../pxelinux.cfg before it reaches the .../pxelinux.cfg/default file ? pxelinux.cfg/01-00-50-56-ba-48-0e pxelinux.cfg/AC12B2D9 pxelinux.cfg/AC12B2D pxelinux.cfg/AC12B2 pxelinux.cfg/AC12B pxelinux.cfg/AC12 pxelinux.cfg/AC1 pxelinux.cfg/AC pxelinux.cfg/A pxelinux.cfg/default It's taking several minutes before moving on to the next file... any thoughts on why t...

I have a new x3655 IBM and whenever the /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge script starts, the ethernet would no longer work. This post isn''t about the cause, but the fix. I did a lot of tcpdumps and Googling, but I''ll spare you that. All they do is prove that yes, there is an issue. :) I tried Debian 4.0 i386/amd64 and Ubuntu 7.04 Server i386/amd64 and they all exhibit the

Hi there.. I'm another ext3 newbie and I have patched and installed 2.4.12-ac1, and compiled from source the above utils.. I saw a link a while back for rpms for these, and I was wondering if anybody knew the url... Also, the question everybody wants to know I think - Does anybody have any idea when the ext3 code will enter the stable kernel tree (not -ac)? I am assumin...

Hi all! It seems the current ext3 code has some problems; my machine is running 2.4.6-ac1 with ext3-0.9 patches on top of it. This afternoon, I was doing some testing of a little piece of code on my machine, and I was able to crash it. What this program does is, in effect something like (pseudo-code) for(i=0; i<100; i++) { fd=creat file-i truncate fd, 50M mmap fd close fd...

...pill is redundant and cleared, as another spill of same value is inserted. The former spill is however not NOP:ed, but KILL:ed, thus the operands get a kill status. The code becomes: %vreg301<def> = mv32Imm 200000000, pred:0, pred:%noreg, %CCReg<imp-def,dead>, %ac0<imp-use>, %ac1<imp-use>; aN32_0_7:%vreg301 Store32FI %vreg301, <fi#93>, pred:0, pred:%noreg, %CCReg<imp-def>; mem:ST4[FixedStack93] aN32_0_7:%vreg301 KILL %vreg301, <fi#93>, 0, %noreg, %CCReg<imp-def>; mem:ST4[FixedStack93] aN32_0_7:%vreg301 %a0_32<def> = COPY %vreg...

An update of the ext3 journalling filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ Patches are against 2.4.6-ac1 and 2.4.6. Changes since 0.0.8 include: - Multiplied the version numbering by ten to cater for bugfix releases against the 0.9.0 stream. - The main thrust has been the removal of a number of changes in the core kernel which were required for to support the journalling of data. This has ca...