search for: absolutly

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> These patches basically remove unused linker scripts and port a change that was made to an unused script. Those are to be applied on top of the gcc 5 bug fixes as they would conflict otherwise. Sylvain Gault (4): diag/mbr: fix dependency to linker script Remove unused linker scripts core: Make symbols defined in linker script HIDDEN

From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> Some linker scripts were splitted into i386 and x86_64 versions in commit d8eede3f2a360163235fad222a0190cd7c5bef38 but older scripts were left there. Signed-off-by: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> --- core/syslinux.ld | 414 ------------------------------------------------ core/x86_64/syslinux.ld | 389

Hi Junaid, Sorry about the confusion, indeed I gave you the wrong output. So let's start to the beginning. I disabled quota and I reactivated it My configuration : Volume Name: venus Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ylal3020:/soft/venus Brick2: ylal3030:/soft/venus Brick3: yval1000:/soft/venus Brick4:

Apologies for the long post. I'm trying to include what I hope are the relevant bits (output of lsusb -v and usbhid-ups) Long term goal: I've got a DIY UPS that I would like to get working with my QNAP NAS (which uses Linux and NUT underneath the hood) Immediate short-term problem: I can't get past running usbhid-ups on Ubuntu 23.10 with an Arduino Leonardo. I have an Arduino Micro

While trying to compile an existing codebase which uses handwritten assembly with LLVM, I ran into an issue around using backward references in assembly absolute expressions. A simple example can be the following snippet: _foo: .fill 0x100 _bar: .fill _bar - _foo _baz: .fill 0x100 While gas compiles this snippet without any errors, the integrated assembler throws an error: expected

This request stems off a bug report I posted https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17757 where it was determined the current behaviour is as expected. To recap: when given a real file, normalizePath() always* returns the full absolute path. When given a non-existent file, normalizePath() returns a full path on Windows but it returns the input on other systems*. I'd argue that

Hi Can we get the result of an intigration without the absolute error? for example f1<-function(x1){(1/gamma(alpha))*x1^(alpha-1)*exp(-x1)*log(x1)} I1<-integrate(f1, 0, (max(cc)-tau1+(theta2/theta1)*tau1)/theta2) I1 0.08007414 with absolute error < 7.2e-05 I need the answer 0.08007414 withou the other part(with absolute error <7.2e-05) how can we do that? thank you and take care

Hi Charles. I patched, reconfigured, remake'd, remake install'd - but no change. however, some more likely helpful information below for you. Thank you On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Greg Hersch <hersch.greg at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> [please use reply-all to include the list, as the list does not override >>

If we are fiddling with normalizePath, having a way of not following symlinks (otheer than ~) would be useful as well. I had to write normalizePath2 in switchr for a specific on-the-ground need to NOT go down all he way to physical paths on a remote compute system because of how IT handled implementing constant pathing on top of swapping out hardware, and I can't imagine i'm the only

The fs[1] function `fs::path_abs()` does what I believe you were expecting `normalizePath()` to do in this case. e.g. setwd("~") normalizePath("foo/bar") #> Warning in normalizePath("foo/bar") : #> path[1]="foo/bar": No such file or directory #> [1] "foo/bar" fs::path_abs("foo/bar") #>

Greetings, Any suggestions? I think I'm close but I can't quite get tripplite_usb to talk to my OMNI1000LCD. I'm new to NUT and couldn't find an answer using Google. With any luck, I've simply missed the obvious. The system I'm using, kaylee, is a debian stable system with some debian testing installed and a 2.6.15.4 kernel. I downloaded NUT 2.0.3 and built it from

I need to calcuate the cumulative probability for the Natural Exponential Family - Hyperbolic secant distribution with a parameter theta between -pi/2 and pi/2. The integration should be between 0 and 1 as it is a probability. The function "integrate" works fine when the absolute value of theta is not too large. That is, the NEF-HS distribution is not too skewed. However, once the

Hello could you please tell me what is the function to get the absolute value of the real or complex number. most of other languages it is abs(x) , what is it in r? I did few searhces in the help docs for no avail. thanks F.J

The background: I'm trying to fit a Poisson-lognormal distrbutuion to some data. This is a way of modelling species abundances: N ~ Pois(lam) log(lam) ~ N(mu, sigma2) The number of individuals are Poisson distributed with an abundance drawn from a log-normal distrbution. To fit this to data, I need to integrate out lam. In principle, I can do it this way: PLN1 <- function(lam, Count,

On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Charles Lepple wrote: > [please use reply-all to include the list, as the list does not override the Reply-To header.] > > On Jun 7, 2015, at 5:02 PM, Greg Hersch <hersch.greg at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here is the driver debug log. If I just let it run, it pops up with >> libusb_get_string_invalid argument over and over again, mixed in the

Dear all, I am quite puzzled about the bound and absolute.t arguments to the l1ce function in the lasso2 package. (The l1ce function estimates the regression parameter b in a regression model y=Xb+e subject to the constraint that |b|<t for some value t). The doc says: bound numeric, either a single number or a vector: the constraint(s) that is/are put onto the L1 norm of the parameters.

I've been thinking a bit more about how useful an absolute timeout is for a oneshot timer in a virtual environment. In principle, absolute times are generally preferable. A relative timeout means "timeout in X ns from now", but the meaning of "now" is ambiguous, particularly if the vcpu can be preempted at any time, which means the determination of "now" can be

I've been thinking a bit more about how useful an absolute timeout is for a oneshot timer in a virtual environment. In principle, absolute times are generally preferable. A relative timeout means "timeout in X ns from now", but the meaning of "now" is ambiguous, particularly if the vcpu can be preempted at any time, which means the determination of "now" can be

The integral of any probability density from -Inf to Inf should equal 1, correct? I don't understand last result below. > integrate(function(x) dnorm(x, 0,1), -Inf, Inf) 1 with absolute error < 9.4e-05 > integrate(function(x) dnorm(x, 100,10), -Inf, Inf) 1 with absolute error < 0.00012 > integrate(function(x) dnorm(x, 500,50), -Inf, Inf) 8.410947e-11 with absolute error <

Dear all, The documentation for `all.equal.numeric` says Numerical comparisons for ?scale = NULL? (the default) are done by first computing the mean absolute difference of the two numerical vectors. If this is smaller than ?tolerance? or not finite, absolute differences are used, otherwise relative differences scaled by the mean absolute difference. But the actual behaviour