search for: absolute_minimum_backend

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "absolute_minimum_backend".

2011 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] LLVM targeting HLLs
...whether this rewrite is happening? The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation is still pretty basic (e.g. http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) and I'm not certain as to whether LLVMTargetMachine is suitable. For example: my HLL can largely be treated as a register machine with an arbitrary number of registers. Can LLVMTargetMachine handle this? -- ┌─── dg@cowlark.com ───── http://www.cowlark.com ───── │ │...
2011 Jan 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM targeting HLLs
...ing? > > The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my > HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff > like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation > is still pretty basic (e.g. > http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) > and I'm not certain as to whether LLVMTargetMachine is suitable. For > example: my HLL can largely be treated as a register machine with an > arbitrary number of registers. Can LLVMTargetMachine handle this? You could create a different code generator from...
2011 Jan 25
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM targeting HLLs
...ramework. > The other thing I could do is to use the LLVMTargetMachine and treat my > HLL as a low-level machine; this gets me a certain amount of good stuff > like register allocation and more optimisations, but the documentation > is still pretty basic (e.g. > http://wiki.llvm.org/Absolute_Minimum_Backend is three short paragraphs) > and I'm not certain as to whether LLVMTargetMachine is suitable. For > example: my HLL can largely be treated as a register machine with an > arbitrary number of registers. Can LLVMTargetMachine handle this? Once I get the new C backend checked in (next we...