Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "abortbroken".
Did you mean:
abortifbroken
2004 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] Verifier & abort()
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 18:04, Misha Brukman wrote:
> Perhaps another solution would be to throw an exception with the error
> message?
Perhaps, but that would violate the programming contract already in
place. Right now LLVM and its users expect failed verifications to cause
an abort(). I wouldn't want to unleash on LLVM the new semantics of now
handling exceptions in every place the