search for: abhishpaliw

On 09/18/2017 09:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Any suggestion would be appreciated... > > On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Any quick suggestion.....? > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL > <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Team...

Any suggestion would be appreciated... On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Any quick suggestion.....? > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> As you can see permission for the glusterfs logs in /var/log/glusterfs is >> 600. &gt...

...unt -t glusterfs" command On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/18/2017 09:22 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Any suggestion would be appreciated... > > > > On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Any quick suggestion.....? > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL > > <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com <mailto:abhishpaliwal at gmail.com>> wrote...

...nting information for "mount -t glusterfs" command I will really appreciate, if some can point light on this area. Also is there any side effect of changing these permissions apart from other user can access these. Regards, Abhishek On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:52 AM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestion would be appreciated... > > On Sep 18, 2017 15:05, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any quick suggestion.....? >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < >> a...

...chedule/ > > Niels > > > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > This is already part of 3.11.0 release? > > > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < > abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Atin, > > >> > > >> Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Abhishek > > >> > > &g...

...> > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > This is already part of 3.11.0 release? > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:47 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL < > > abhishpaliwal at gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi Atin, > > > >> > > > >> Could you please let us know any time plan for deliver of this patch. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >>...

Could you please response? On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 5:55 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > Whenever I am performing the IO operation on gluster volume, the loads is > getting increase on CPU which reaches upto 70-80 sometimes. > > when we started debugging, found that the io_worker thread is created to > server the IO request...

Any quick suggestion.....? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:50 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > As you can see permission for the glusterfs logs in /var/log/glusterfs is > 600. > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 140 Jan 1 00:00 .. > *-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 3 20:21 cmd_history.log* > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Jan 3 20:21...

Hi Team, As you can see permission for the glusterfs logs in /var/log/glusterfs is 600. drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 140 Jan 1 00:00 .. *-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan 3 20:21 cmd_history.log* drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Jan 3 20:21 bricks drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 100 Jan 3 20:21 . *-rw------- 1 root root 2102 Jan 3 20:21 etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log* Due to that non-root user is not able to

Hi Team, Whenever I am performing the IO operation on gluster volume, the loads is getting increase on CPU which reaches upto 70-80 sometimes. when we started debugging, found that the io_worker thread is created to server the IO request and consume high CPU till that request gets completed. Could you please let me know why io_worker thread takes this much of CPU. Is there any way to resole

I hope these logs were sufficient... please let me know if you require more logs. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:26 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Atin, > > Please find the backtrace and logs files attached here. > > Also, below are the BT from core. > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0x00003fff8834b898 in __GI_raise (sig=<optimized out>) at > ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:55 > &gt...

Any suggestion.... On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > We are getting the crash in glusterd after start of it. When I tried to > debug in brick logs we are getting below errors: > > [2017-12-01 14:10:14.684122] E [MSGID: 100018] > [glusterfsd.c:1960:glusterfs_pidfile_update] 0-glusterfsd: p...

Without the glusterd log file and the core file or the backtrace I can't comment anything. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Any suggestion.... > > On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> We are getting the crash in glusterd after start of it. When I tried to >> debug in brick logs we...

...ailable to us to think through why this fix is critical. Also as I mentioned earlier, this piece of change touches upon the core store utils code path which need to be thought out really well with all the corner cases before pushing the commit. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:32 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am facing one issue which is exactly same as mentioned on the below link > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408431 > > Also there are some patches available to fix the issue but seems those are > not approved and stil...

Hi Team, I am facing one issue which is exactly same as mentioned on the below link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408431 Also there are some patches available to fix the issue but seems those are not approved and still discussion is going on https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16279/ Currently the status is "Abandoned". Could you please let me know what is our plan to

...64/clone.S:96 No locals. Regards, Abhishek On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: > Without the glusterd log file and the core file or the backtrace I can't > comment anything. > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:09 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Any suggestion.... >> >> On Dec 6, 2017 11:51, "ABHISHEK PALIWAL" <abhishpaliwal at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> We are getting the crash in glusterd after start of it. When I trie...

Hi Team, I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is low, but when we apply the ACL on gluster volume which internally uses Fuse ACL, CPU load gets increase about 6x times. Could you please let me know is this expected or we can do some other configuration to reduce this type of overhead on gluster

Hi Atin/Team, We are using gluster-3.7.6 with setup of two brick and while restart of system I have seen that the glusterd daemon is getting failed from start. At the time of analyzing the logs from etc-glusterfs.......log file I have received the below logs [2017-05-06 03:33:39.798087] I [MSGID: 100030] [glusterfsd.c:2348:main] 0-/usr/sbin/glusterd: Started running /usr/sbin/glusterd version

Hi Team, While mounting the gluster volume using 'mount -t glusterfs' command it is getting failed. When we checked the log file getting the below logs [1970-01-02 10:54:04.420065] E [MSGID: 101187] [event-epoll.c:391:event_register_epoll] 0-epoll: failed to add fd(=7) to epoll fd(=0) [Invalid argument] [1970-01-02 10:54:04.420140] W [socket.c:3095:socket_connect] 0-: failed to register

What is Gluster/NFS and how can we use this. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:03:02PM +0530, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > I have an query regarding the usage of ACL on gluster volume. I have > > noticed that when we use normal gluster volume (without ACL) CPU load is > >