search for: abergeron

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "abergeron".

Did you mean: bergeron
2008 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD port in progress
Hello, > If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another > version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I > can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just > ask me what you need. This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider using current svn top of tree, not 2.3 release. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov
2008 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD port in progress
2008/9/21 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>: > Hello, > >> If anybody has an idea of how to fix this (other than using another >> version of gcc because I am sick of compiling), I would appreciate. I >> can offer backtraces or shell access if anybody is interested, just >> ask me what you need. > This was fixed couple of months ago. Please consider
2008 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] -instcombine broken with fastcall
I found this with LLVM 2.3 and reproduced with svn as of about thirty minutes ago and they both fail in the same way. If you run this code through opt -instcombine define fastcc i64 @fibo(i64) { switch i64 %0, label %2 [ i64 0, label %8 i64 1, label %8 ] ; <label>:2 ; preds = %1 %3 = sub i64 %0, 1 ; <i64> [#uses=1] %4 = call i64 @fibo(i64 %3) ; <i64> [#uses=1] %5 =
2008 Apr 15
0
Small memory leak in plot on OS X (PR#11170)
Full_Name: Arnaud Bergeron Version: 2.6.2 OS: Mac OS X 10.5.2 Submission from: (NULL) (69.157.224.197) When I run the following loop repeat { plot(seq(5), seq(5)) } the memory consumed by the process goes up by a small amout each time. I tried this with the quartz() and pdf() output devices. Only a single output device is created by the process and is repeatedly overwritten by plot(). Also
2008 Sep 21
2
[LLVMdev] OpenBSD port in progress
While building an OpenBSD port for LLVM 2.3 I encountered a few issues. The first one is that the system compiler $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/amd64-unknown-openbsd4.3/3.3.5/specs Configured with: Thread model: single gcc version 3.3.5 (propolice) Fails to build TableGen correctly which then crashes while processing the tables for ARM. I fixed this by using gcc 4.2.0 The