search for: abe1854f

On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Talin wrote: > Hooray! > > I'm thinking that getting unit tests for the classes in ADT should > be an > early goal. Can I suggest the AP[S]Int class? If you look in llvm/test/Integer you'll see a whole bunch of tests that really want to be unit tests but that aren't. :( -Chris

...? Are the double llvm-as/llvm-dis tests about bitcode printing/parsing or are they really testing some auto-simplification built-in to the APSInt class? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090105/abe1854f/attachment.html>

Hooray! I'm thinking that getting unit tests for the classes in ADT should be an early goal. I also wanted to mention a point about the general philosophy of unit testing, which is that the presence of such tests alters the calculation of risk when making changes to a code base. Programmers have various rules of thumb for estimating risk - for example, a change which affects a large