search for: abdulrasool

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saleem, >> >> Though a simple app works great I am facing few issues trying to link a >> slightly complex object file, generated via...

...Saleem, The target is Windows phone 8.1 (ARM). I'll update the crash details tomorrow. One big problem is that I have to use a physical windows phone for execution. I wonder if it is possible to execute such "exes" using qemu. Regards, Kashyap On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saleem, >> I have a similar situation - I'd appreciate your inputs on it. I noticed >> that the obj file generated using llvm does not co...

Greetings, As previously mentioned, the unwind contents are going to be moved today. Im working on this now. If you could please hold off any commits to the Unwind part of things, it would be greatly appreciated. See you on the new layout! -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150424/0848b094/attachment.html>

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > >> Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? >> > > Sure, but what is the default unwinder for a given platform? >...

...nd m.exe gets generated. However I noticed a difference in the dumpbin output for a.obj and m.obj - In m.obj, I can see "Thumb instructions" where as in a.obj, I don't see that. I'd appreciate any pointers on this. Regards, Kashyap On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <abdulras at fb.com> wrote: > > On May 28, 2014, at 5:18 AM, Rajat Mahajan <rmahajan at adobe.com> wrote: > > > I am talking about Windows Mobile 8 and 8.1 and not CE. > > Not sure though that the Windows 8 (ARM NT) is similar to Windows Mobile > 8 platform. &gt...

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote: >> >>> Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? >>> >> >> Sure, but what is the default un...

...-filetype=obj <some_name>.bc The object file generated in the above object doesn't get linked when I try to link it with the windows mobile library as it fails to recognize the object format. ( Not a valid object file ) Hope I am clear. ~rajat -----Original Message----- From: Saleem Abdulrasool [mailto:abdulras at fb.com] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:23 PM To: Rajat Mahajan Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Code generation support in llvm for windows phone On May 16, 2014, at 6:53 AM, Rajat Mahajan <rmahajan at adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there sup...

...s. Seems like there are some fixup issues related to b.w instruction. Note that I am using Visual Studio’s linker to create a Window’s phone app. I would really appreciate any help, or pointers for further investigation, for the second issue above. Thanks, Daman On 09/06/14 8:45 pm, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <abdulras at fb.com<mailto:abdulras at fb.com>> wrote: On Jun 8, 2014, at 10:46 PM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com<mailto:dsingh at adobe.com>> wrote: Thanks a lot Saleem, The issue is fixed and a simple app works fine now. Awesome; thanks for the verification...

...linker options are pushed into a custom section, and a secondary program is used to extract the options from this section prior to the linker being invoked. This adds a lot of complexity to the driver as well as additional tools being invoked in the build chain slowing down the build. -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180103/3f4e92db/attachment.html>

...ata - optional POSIX layer - optional inclusion of C11 annexes - complete enough to replace the default system libc > -Chris > > On Jun 27, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Owen Anderson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Jun 27, 2019, at 2:53 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> So, what do you think about incorporating this new libc under the LLVM >> project? >> > > As stated, I really feel that this is far too specialised to certain use > cases that are pertinent to Googl...

...ut I'm not against the idea, if anyone feels > strongly about it. > > If all of us could agree to a common solution, and make sure all > interested parties are in, we should do the move before 3.7. > > Please, cast your votes. > > cheers, > --renato > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150204/0140584d/attachment.html>

On 30 Jan 2015 21:24, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > The library is agnostic of the unwinder, the driver is who cares (as it needs to generate the linker invocation). I think that adding a flag to control that similar to -rtlib is probably what we may have to do then. What about the default unwinde...

...mly take any of the combination IA-64 or MS C++ ABI + MS C ABI or the MinGW environment (which is IA-64 ABI and its supplementary libraries). I understand that this may be controversial since it can potentially break existing code bases, but I think that the result of this is worth it. -- Saleem Abdulrasool abdulras (at) fb (dot) com

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 22 April 2015 at 03:40, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: >> So after a bit of a hiatus (sorry, other stuff has been eating up my free >> time), Id like to pick this up again. I think that its a matter of just >> copying the unwind sources into the right place. Im hoping to do this >> somet...

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> What about the default unwinder for Compiler-RT? Should we assume our >> own? Gcc's? Assuming nothing will break compilation, since the...

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:58 PM Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > For what it is worth, I do believe that these files do really belong in > the libc project because they are so intricately tied to the implementation > of the language. I just think that the fact these files will be part of > the project is me...

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Saleem Abdulrasool via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > > Hello all, > > > > There was some interest from a number of a few people about adding > support > > for embedded linker options to ELF. This would be an extension that > > requires linker support to a...

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> There was some interest from a number of a few people about adding >> support for embedded linker options to ELF. This would be an extension >> that requires linker support to actually work, but has...

On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 9 September 2014 02:18, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> > wrote: > > The current implementations actually return 0. Can you point out where > that > > doesn't hold please? > > With the current implementation... > > int foo(int a) { > return __aeabi_idiv0(a); > } > > return...

...______ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> > -- > Jon Roelofs > jonathan at codesourcery.com > CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140906/314dc41d/attachment.html>