Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "abdication".
Did you mean:
abdicating
2009 Nov 13
4
[LLVMdev] -debug and -print-machineinstrs broken
On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, you wrote:
> > Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either.
> >
> > $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc
>
> Seems due to David's patches.
Ok, it's faulting in SlotTracker with what looks like a bad Function. One of
the Argument values is corrupted.
I'm not abdicating responsibility, but at
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] -debug and -print-machineinstrs broken
On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:49 PM, David Greene wrote:
> On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, you wrote:
>>> Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either.
>>>
>>> $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc
>>
>> Seems due to David's patches.
>
> Ok, it's faulting in SlotTracker with what looks like a bad Function. One
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] -debug and -print-machineinstrs broken
> Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either.
>
> $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc
Seems due to David's patches.
--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Nov 13
1
[LLVMdev] -debug and -print-machineinstrs broken
On Friday 13 November 2009 16:28, Dan Gohman wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:49 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > On Friday 13 November 2009 15:17, you wrote:
> >>> Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using
> >>> either.
> >>>
> >>> $ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc
> >>
> >> Seems due to
2015 Feb 10
2
Another Fedora decision
On Tue, February 10, 2015 4:04 pm, Warren Young wrote:
>> On Feb 9, 2015, at 12:12 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the
>>> PDF
>>> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH.
>>>
2015 Feb 10
0
Another Fedora decision
Valeri and Warren,
My decisions are based on what I know. Those decisions can be called
"informed decisions".
I am not abdicating anything to you two gentlemen.
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
2006 Aug 25
1
hdc lost interrupt
Hello
After updating to the 2.6.9-42 kernel, one of my boxes stall during boot
with
hdc lost interrupt
ide-cd:cmd 0x3 timed out
The older 2.6.9-35 kernel boots fine. This is a Compaq Proliant PL360.
The odd part is, I have another, identical Proliant that runs the new
kernel just fine.
Any idea what is happening?
Thanks
Jamie
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2009 Nov 05
1
stepAIC(coxph) forward selection
Dear R-Help,
I am trying to perform forward selection on the following coxph model:
>my.bpfs <- Surv(bcox$pfsdays, bcox$pfscensor)
> b.cox <- coxph(my.bpfs ~ Cbase + Abase + Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender +
as.factor(eor) + Age)>stepAIC(b.cox, scope=list(upper =~ Cbase + Abase +
Cbave + CbSD + KPS + gender + as.factor(eor) + Age, lower=~1), direction=
c("forward"))
However
2009 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] -debug and -print-machineinstrs broken
Are these known to be broken right now? I get failure when using either.
$ llc -march=arm -print-machineinstrs hw.bc
...
BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %entry
Live Ins: %LR %R7
%SP<def> = SUBri %SP<kill>, 8, 14, %reg0, %reg0
STR %LR<kill>, %SP, %reg0, 4, 14, %reg0; mem:ST4[0 llc
0x008b3304 PrintStackTrace(void*) + 45
1 llc 0x008b390c