search for: ab214fee

> > Is this what you mean? Is there any reason to keep the .bc files distinct > > like a ".a" file, or is it ok for your purposes to link them together into > > a single unit, like a ".so" file? > > Well, the answer depends on whether the individual modules are > separately loadable or not. Suppose the resulting bytecode file gets JIT > loaded

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 10:44, Chris Lattner wrote: > > In other words, I'd like to take a set of bytecode files, optimize them > > together even though they don't form a complete program, and then write > > out the new (optimized) bytecode files. It would be preferable to write > > them out to a single archive rather than to individual bytecode files > >

...When you have time, I'd like to hear what you're planning in this area as it will directly effect how I build my compiler and VM. Thanks, Reid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/ab214fee/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/ab214fee/attachm...