Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "aarch64asmparser".
2013 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] Please document the layers
On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:55 PM, "Robinson, Paul" <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists.
> While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing,
> there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers.
> Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and
2013 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] Please document the layers
I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists.
While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing,
there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers.
Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and error-prone
(or we wouldn't see so many violations in code reviews, eh?).
Now, I understand that Google has some sort
2014 Apr 03
5
[LLVMdev] comparing .o files from different build trees
...e+Asserts/AArch64RegisterInfo.o differ: byte 20886, line 17
./lib/Target/AArch64/InstPrinter/Release+Asserts/AArch64InstPrinter.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/InstPrinter/Release+Asserts/AArch64InstPrinter.o differ: byte 332540, line 591
./lib/Target/AArch64/AsmParser/Release+Asserts/AArch64AsmParser.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/AsmParser/Release+Asserts/AArch64AsmParser.o differ: byte 250094, line 1056
./lib/Target/AArch64/Disassembler/Release+Asserts/AArch64Disassembler.o ../../recurse2be/build/./lib/Target/AArch64/Disassembler/Release+Asserts/AArch64Disassembler.o differ: by...