Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "aaeval".
Did you mean:
a_val
2011 Apr 27
3
[LLVMdev] Regression tests in 2.9
....2.4 (Ubuntu 4.2.4-1ubuntu4)
Something should be wrong with my environment...
The only differences I noticed during the compilation are the following
warnings (which appear several times, but each time in ilist.h):
llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h: In member function ‘virtual
bool<unnamed>::AAEval::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:
llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: warning: ‘this.581’ is used
uninitialized in this function
llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: note: ‘this.581’ was declared here
llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: warning: ‘this.581’ is used
uninitialized in this...
2011 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] Regression tests in 2.9
On Apr 26, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Damien Vincent wrote:
>
> I am testing the latest LLVM release (2.9).
> When I run the regression tests, I get many failures:
>
> cd llvm-2.9.build/test
> make
> Expected Passes : 2605
> Expected Failures : 46
> Unsupported Tests : 542
> >>> Unexpected Failures: 2658
>
> For info:
> - I was working with
2011 Apr 26
2
[LLVMdev] Regression tests in 2.9
I am testing the latest LLVM release (2.9).
When I run the regression tests, I get many failures:
cd llvm-2.9.build/test
make
Expected Passes : 2605
Expected Failures : 46
Unsupported Tests : 542
>>> Unexpected Failures: 2658
For info:
- I was working with 2.8 so far and I didn't have these issues.
- LLVM was build using: ../llvm-2.9/configure --enable-assertions
2011 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] Regression tests in 2.9
...> Something should be wrong with my environment...
>
> The only differences I noticed during the compilation are the following
> warnings (which appear several times, but each time in ilist.h):
> llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h: In member function ‘virtual
> bool<unnamed>::AAEval::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:
> llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: warning: ‘this.581’ is used
> uninitialized in this function
> llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: note: ‘this.581’ was declared here
> llvm-2.9/include/llvm/ADT/ilist.h:175: warning: ‘this.581’ is used
&g...
2019 Jun 12
2
[RFC][SCEV] Behavior of AddRec in CompareSCEVComplexity
Hi,
Thanks for the input. In my ptr_test.O1.ll, the two loops should fall into
the last case due to loop rotations. And I think we should handle that case.
I propose to check the dominance relation between loop predecessor blocks
of the two loops if there is no dominance relation between their loop
headers just like case three. The only thing I'm not pretty sure is that is
there guarantee to