Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "aacplusenc".
2012 Jul 31
0
No subject
...39;s not surprising given how good it sounds.
I'm not so sure about device support though, and encoding it is a bit of
an issue (see above). There is libaacplus, but streamTranscoderv3 doesn't
*appear* to support it. I think Liquid Soap might though. There's also
something called AACPlusEnc but I can't seem to get to its home page.
While we're considering non-free options, Windows Media Audio would seem
to be out due to the desire to encode under Linux, and people seem to be
moving away from Real Audio.
Of course, I'd prefer to use something open if people can actually...
2012 Jul 31
0
No subject
...t's not surprising given how good it sounds.
I'm not so sure about device support though, and encoding it is a bit of an
issue (see above). There is libaacplus, but streamTranscoderv3 doesn't
*appear* to support it. I think Liquid Soap might though. There's also
something called AACPlusEnc but I can't seem to get to its home page.
While we're considering non-free options, Windows Media Audio would seem to
be out due to the desire to encode under Linux, and people seem to be moving
away from Real Audio.
Of course, I'd prefer to use something open if people can actually l...
2012 Aug 01
2
Higher quality narrowband streaming options
...39;s not surprising given how good it sounds.
I'm not so sure about device support though, and encoding it is a bit of
an issue (see above). There is libaacplus, but streamTranscoderv3 doesn't
*appear* to support it. I think Liquid Soap might though. There's also
something called AACPlusEnc but I can't seem to get to its home page.
While we're considering non-free options, Windows Media Audio would seem
to be out due to the desire to encode under Linux, and people seem to be
moving away from Real Audio.
Of course, I'd prefer to use something open if people can actually...