Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "aac010".
Did you mean:
aac001
2017 Nov 16
2
Opus vs AAC (endurance test)
...000.wav" 001.opus
opusdec.exe 001.opus opus001.wav
wavdiff 000.wav opus001.wav
Comparing 000.wav - opus001.wav...
Max diff: -22.5646dB
RMS diff: -39.0425dB
Mean diff: -38.7372dB
Opus @482kbps is much better than AAC @288kbps.
now let's see what happens after 10 passes
Comparing 000.wav - aac010.wav...
Max diff: -16.1286dB
RMS diff: -32.3361dB
Mean diff: -31.715dB
AAC stepped back just a little
Comparing 000.wav - opus010.wav...
Max diff: -7.61385dB
RMS diff: -20.3666dB
Mean diff: -20.1286dB
Opus made complete disaster, but HF looks
good (so it isn't an error in frames
synchronisati...
2017 Nov 16
0
Opus vs AAC (endurance test)
...001.wav
> wavdiff 000.wav opus001.wav
> Comparing 000.wav - opus001.wav...
> Max diff: -22.5646dB
> RMS diff: -39.0425dB
> Mean diff: -38.7372dB
>
> Opus @482kbps is much better than AAC @288kbps.
> now let's see what happens after 10 passes
>
> Comparing 000.wav - aac010.wav...
> Max diff: -16.1286dB
> RMS diff: -32.3361dB
> Mean diff: -31.715dB
>
> AAC stepped back just a little
>
> Comparing 000.wav - opus010.wav...
> Max diff: -7.61385dB
> RMS diff: -20.3666dB
> Mean diff: -20.1286dB
>
> Opus made complete disaster, but HF loo...