Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "aaargh".
Did you mean:
aargh
2006 Mar 31
2
AAARGH! Need some fresh eyes to look at this pls
I just switched my rails app over to production mode, couldn''t get it
working, switched it back to development mode, and now nothing gets
outputted in the browser. I''m sure I''ve missed something in the configs.
Setup: Lighttpd/SCGI on WinXP, Rails 1.0.
Environment.rb:
ENV[''RAILS_ENV''] ||= ''development''
require
2005 Jan 05
4
Aaargh Gentoo updated some packages now * won't start
After emerging some updates this morning asterisk 1.0.3 fails to start
I get the following errors:
..Jan 6 00:39:24 WARNING[28998]: chan_zap.c:765 zt_open: Unable to
specify channel 1: No such device or address
Jan 6 00:39:24 ERROR[28998]: chan_zap.c:6197 mkintf: Unable to open
channel 1: No such device or address
here = 0, tmp->channel = 1, channel = 1
Jan 6 00:39:24 ERROR[28998]:
2007 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
...#39;? I'm currently thinking I might
drop most of my code that was based on the 1.8 sources and basically
start again from the 2.0 lli sources. A much bigger job than I'd
anticipated, though it would be a lot worse if my backtracking memory
implementation hadn't been kept separate.
Aaargh, etc. That'll teach me not to develop against the head branch...
[s]
2012 Jul 05
3
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
...er B isn't live
> before that instruction.
>
> But you probably shouldn't be doing this yourself. Your NewMI code isn't
in
> SSA form because B has multiple definitions. Just use a REG_SEQUENCE
> instruction, and let the register allocator do the transformation for you.
Aaargh. So you mean something like this ?
New_MI_1:: Vreg1 = 0 ; Vreg1 and Vreg2
are 32 bit virt. regs.
New_MI_2:: Vreg2 = COPY C:lo_sub_reg.
New_MI_3:: B= REG_SEQUENCE<Vreg1, hi_sub_reg, Vreg2, lo_sub_reg> ; B is a
64 bit virt reg.
TIA,
Pranav
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] GenericValue changes from 1.8 to 2.0
Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Sarah Thompson wrote:
>
>
>> Do I understand correctly that there is nothing that the current gcc
>> front end generates that wouldn't fit an old-style GenericValue? I'm
>> wondering if this might be an interim approach that would avoid me
>> needing to rewrite huge amounts of code, and since we're not
2020 May 14
1
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
...t/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-16
> a=ptime:20
> a=maxptime:150
> a=sendrecv
>
> <------------>
>
> And when I look at the RTP debugging I see the data from the remote is:
>
> Got RTP packet from xx.xx.xx.xx:50644 (type 18, seq 001338, ts 610458, len 000020)
>
> AAArgh! Type 18 is g729. Why on earth is the remote sending me g729 when
> I clearly said the only thing I could do was alaw.
>
> Is this legal?
>
> Is the other side broken?
>
It shouldn't be sending it, but as well we should be ignoring it. I believe
we do ignore in modern versi...
2012 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Pranav Bhandarkar <pranavb at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This question relates to the undef flag in the context of sub-register def
> operands.
>
> 1) Firstly, the documentation (comments in the source code) says that in a
> sub-register def operand, the "IsUndef" flag refers to the part of the
> register that is not
1998 Jul 26
0
R-beta: Become our Partner
vixens70 at hotmail.com writes:
> EARN CASH with your page and website -- $$$$$$$$$ -- EARN CASH
> with your webpage -- $$$$$$$$$ -- this is a one time mailing - $$$$$$$$$
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AAARGH!
We seem to have found our way onto the email lists of a spammer.
I believe that Martin Maechler is out of town presently, but perhaps
he can find a way of blocking this kind of junk in the future. (The
absence of a To: field could be used for filtering in this particular
case). Unfortunately, t...
2012 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
Hi,
This question relates to the undef flag in the context of sub-register def
operands.
1) Firstly, the documentation (comments in the source code) says that in a
sub-register def operand, the "IsUndef" flag refers to the part of the
register that is not written.
2) Further, the documentation about readsReg() states that a sub-register
def implicitly reads the other parts of the
2012 Aug 03
2
no space left on device
Hi,
I am new to btrfs, and just installed a new system with SLED 11 SP2 a
few days ago.
However the system seems to be in a real sad state now, saying there
is no free space left on the device even though there is about 8GB
left on the / filesystem.
A defragment works sometimes but then it goes back to the original
state a day or two later. Other times the command just won''t respond.
2020 Aug 06
0
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch_local*() helpers
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 09:47:23AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Testing my hypothesis that raw then nested non-raw
> local_irq_save/restore() breaks IRQ state tracking -- see the reproducer
> below. This is at least 1 case I can think of that we're bound to hit.
Aaargh!
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 15bd0efff3df..0873319dcff4 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,22 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> sfi_init_late();
> kcsan_init();
>
> + /* DEBUG CODE */
> +...
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
...:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-16
> a=ptime:20
> a=maxptime:150
> a=sendrecv
>
> <------------>
And when I look at the RTP debugging I see the data from the remote is:
> Got RTP packet from xx.xx.xx.xx:50644 (type 18, seq 001338, ts 610458,
> len 000020)
AAArgh! Type 18 is g729. Why on earth is the remote sending me g729
when I clearly said the only thing I could do was alaw.
Is this legal?
Is the other side broken?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/...
2004 Aug 06
2
icecast and ssl -error?
Hi!
Karl Heyes wrote:
[...]
> it doesn't do anything with ssl, however it depends on curl for YP and
> that can have a dependency on ssl. Either install the ssl lib or
> install curl without ssl support.
I've installed a separate curl without-ssl and specified the curl-path
when configuering icecast, but the make rises still the same error :-(
Any idea?!
Thanks for any hint!
2009 Feb 03
2
ThinkCell type waterfall charts in R?
Hi all,
with PowerPoint and ThinkCell one can draw something they call waterfall
chart and it looks like this:
http://www.think-cell.com/products/images/waterfall.gif
I found discussions on waterfall charts in the archive of this
mailinglist, but unfortunately they looked totally different. Other
names for this type of plot seem to be bridge chart, cascade chart,
stair case chart, etc. but
2007 Oct 02
6
Push /home/* directories recursively to clients
Hi I am trying to push populate /home & subdirectories from the puppet
server to all the Linux clients.
I managed this with cfengine using rsync. But I am not sure how do I
achieve this in puppet, do we have any inbuilt function for this.
Also, is there a function for userdel like for useradd (user)
groupadd(group).
Any suggestion is appreciated.
--
Deepak
2004 Sep 12
3
libogg 1.1.1 release
Everyone,
Pleased to announce the release of libogg version 1.1.1. This is a
bugfix release on last year's 1.1 release.
Source archives are available from our new download site:
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.1.1.tar.gz
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.1.1.zip
Maintained from the /releases subtree on svn.xiph.org. This release is
tagged in the
2004 Sep 12
3
libogg 1.1.1 release
Everyone,
Pleased to announce the release of libogg version 1.1.1. This is a
bugfix release on last year's 1.1 release.
Source archives are available from our new download site:
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.1.1.tar.gz
http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/ogg/libogg-1.1.1.zip
Maintained from the /releases subtree on svn.xiph.org. This release is
tagged in the
2020 May 14
6
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729 or
alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw
right? In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I get
the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec
translation path: (g729) -> (alaw)" and the call hangs up. Why?
Last minute thought: Is it possible that
2006 Jun 29
7
Mongrel says it works, but it doesn''t
Hello, I came to know of mongrel by pure chance, it interrested me cause
webrick never worked and instantrails for rails was very slow. the problem
with webrick is/was is that it says just this:
>ruby script/server
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/entity.rb:21: warning: character class
has `-'' without escape
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rexml/entity.rb:21: warning: character
2020 Aug 05
9
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch_local*() helpers
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:42PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote:
> > Shouldn't we __always_inline those? They're going to be really small.
>
> I can send a v2, and you can choose. For reference, though:
>
> ffffffff86271ee0 <arch_local_save_flags>:
> ffffffff86271ee0: 0f 1f 44 00 00