Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "aaarch32".
Did you mean:
aarch32
2014 Nov 25
2
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
...ct before this patch. I just re-used the infrastructure.
> >
> > ARMv8 shouldn?t need Neon detection at all ? Neon is a mandatory part of the ARMv8 architecture, unlike ARMv7, where it?s optional.
> As I understand, your statement for ARMv8 is true for AAarch64 mode. But for ARMv8 in AAarch32 mode, neon is still optional (although I haven't heard of an implementation that does not support NEON even in AAarch32 mode). So, for AArch64 mode, I think rtcd can be disabled. Also, even the neon detection procedure currently in opus will not work on ARMv8 AArch32 mode. Please refer
> htt...
2014 Nov 25
0
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
...re in the
project before this patch. I just re-used the infrastructure.
>
> ARMv8 shouldn?t need Neon detection at all ? Neon is a mandatory part of
the ARMv8 architecture, unlike ARMv7, where it?s optional.
As I understand, your statement for ARMv8 is true for AAarch64 mode. But
for ARMv8 in AAarch32 mode, neon is still optional (although I haven't
heard of an implementation that does not support NEON even in AAarch32
mode). So, for AArch64 mode, I think rtcd can be disabled. Also, even the
neon detection procedure currently in opus will not work on ARMv8 AArch32
mode. Please refer
http://c...
2014 Nov 25
4
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > Also is there plans to make the NEON optimisations on ARMv7 run time
> > detectable like they have in cairo/pixman? For generic distributions
> > it would nice to be able to be able to enable them as they offer
> > decent performance improvements but have the code
2014 Nov 25
0
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
...ready there in the project before this patch. I just re-used the infrastructure.
ARMv8 shouldn?t need Neon detection at all ? Neon is a mandatory part of the ARMv8 architecture, unlike ARMv7, where it?s optional.
As I understand, your statement for ARMv8 is true for AAarch64 mode. But for ARMv8 in AAarch32 mode, neon is still optional (although I haven't heard of an implementation that does not support NEON even in AAarch32 mode). So, for AArch64 mode, I think rtcd can be disabled. Also, even the neon detection procedure currently in opus will not work on ARMv8 AArch32 mode. Please refer
http://c...
2014 Nov 25
1
[RFC PATCHv1] cover: celt_pitch_xcorr: Introduce ARM neon intrinsics
...this patch. I just re-used the infrastructure.
>
>
> ARMv8 shouldn?t need Neon detection at all ? Neon is a mandatory part of the
> ARMv8 architecture, unlike ARMv7, where it?s optional.
>
> As I understand, your statement for ARMv8 is true for AAarch64 mode. But for
> ARMv8 in AAarch32 mode, neon is still optional (although I haven't heard of
> an implementation that does not support NEON even in AAarch32 mode). So, for
> AArch64 mode, I think rtcd can be disabled. Also, even the neon detection
> procedure currently in opus will not work on ARMv8 AArch32 mode. Please...