search for: aa9

Hi, May be this helps: m1<- as.matrix(read.table(text=" y1 g24 y1 0 1 g24 1 0 ",sep="",header=TRUE)) m2<-as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 c1 c2 l17 ?y1 0 1 1 1 ?c1 1 0 1 1 ?c2 1 1 0 1 ?l17 1 1 1 0",sep="",header=TRUE)) m3<- as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 h4??? s2???? s30 ?y1 0 1 1 1 ?h4 1 0 1 1 ?s2 1 1 0 1 ?s30 1 1 1

...403 objects (0 linked attributes) for CN=Configuration,DC=arbeitsgruppe,DC=mydomain,DC=at Partition[CN=Configuration,DC=arbeitsgruppe,DC=mydomain,DC=at] objects[1624/1624] linked_values[28/28] Missing target while attempting to apply records: Deleted target CN=NTDS Settings\0ADEL:b0ca200f-4015-48e5-aa9e-2d85768ce6c2,CN=BACKUP,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=arbeitsgruppe,DC=mydomain,DC=at GUID b0ca200f-4015-48e5-aa9e-2d85768ce6c2 linked from CN=ccde0790-f7cc-449e-97a5-93993d2bb083,CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=arbeitsgruppe,DC=mydomain,DC=at Failed to commi...

I happily and trustfully use Louis' backup-script from https://github.com/thctlo/samba4 to dump AD content via cronjob. Is it necessary/recommended to do that on *each* samba DC? Is there something server-specific in the dump(s) or is it enough to do that once per domain? thanks ...

Am 2017-12-28 um 15:55 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai Stephan, > > You need also this in smb.conf > > # enable offline logins > winbind offline logon = yes On which server(s)? The DCs? the DM? > I did also test my logins with one DC turned off. > And login on the DM is no problem or my pcs, no problem. > > I did not test the AD logins thats

Hi all, I''m looking for a function, gem, etc. that will help to unify dates as they come in different formats. If the date comes in (1/2/2012,2012-01-02,01-02-2012,20120102,01022012, etc.) it would be nice to have it come out 2012-01-02. I''ve searched for a few days and only find ways to convert this format to that format. I might be using the wrong search terms and this

...read-write locks are part of POSIX-threads (pthreads). There is an implementation of Slim read-write locks on Windows, but unfortunately for in-process only (i.e., the locks can’t be shared among different processes), so it won’t work for us. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa904937(v=vs.85).aspx However, on Windows, we could implement read-write locks ourselves, using a combination of a named mutex and a named semaphore (any unique global name could be used for creating a named mutex/semaphore, the simplest one will be the cache file name itself). Here is an example of...