Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "a_speci".
Did you mean:
a_spec
2016 Nov 05
2
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
...d some offline)
thoughts and suggestions!
My current summary:
1) I really don't want a --<option-key>=value
but rather stay with logical/binary variables that "express
themselves"... in the same way I strongly prefer
if (A_is_special) ....
to
if (A_special == TRUE) ....
for a logical variable A_* . Yes, this is mostly a matter
of taste,.. but related to how R style itself "works"
2) Brian mentioned that this is only about ./tests/ tests which
are continued, not about the Examples which are treated separately.
That's w...
2016 Nov 07
0
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
...> My current summary:
>
> 1) I really don't want a --<option-key>=value
> but rather stay with logical/binary variables that "express
> themselves"... in the same way I strongly prefer
>
> if (A_is_special) ....
> to
> if (A_special == TRUE) ....
>
> for a logical variable A_* . Yes, this is mostly a matter
> of taste,.. but related to how R style itself "works"
>
> 2) Brian mentioned that this is only about ./tests/ tests which
> are continued, not about the Examples which are treated...
2016 Nov 08
1
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
...>> 1) I really don't want a --<option-key>=value
>> but rather stay with logical/binary variables that "express
>> themselves"... in the same way I strongly prefer
>>
>> if (A_is_special) ....
>> to
>> if (A_special == TRUE) ....
>>
>> for a logical variable A_* . Yes, this is mostly a matter
>> of taste,.. but related to how R style itself "works"
>>
>> 2) Brian mentioned that this is only about ./tests/ tests which
>> are continued,...
2016 Nov 04
3
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
>>>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
>>>>> on Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:36:52 -0500 writes:
> On 4 November 2016 at 16:24, Martin Maechler wrote: | My
> proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if |
> somebody has a more concise or better "English style"
> wording | (which is somewhat compatible with