Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "a_qa".
Did you mean:
a_a
2017 Feb 13
2
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
...ly related
> to your code.
>
> 1) The overflow condition is essentially untested because none of the
> tests in "make check" reliably triggers it. That may be a good case for
> an explicit unit test. IIRC, the case could be triggered by the
> following input vector:
> A_QA[] = { 46596096, -72118272, 78532608, -69447680, 52707328,
> -22073344, -19890176, 50507776, -54829056, 45518848, -33939456,
> 21086208, -7127040, -4136960, 3993600, -1699840 }
>
> 2) I'm not quite sure what to make of silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain_Q24().
> It seems to never be calle...
2017 Feb 07
3
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
Hi,
Attached is a patch with arm neon optimizations for
silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain(). Please review.
Thanks,
Linfeng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170207/5c5ab508/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2017 Feb 15
2
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
...) The overflow condition is essentially untested because none of the
> > tests in "make check" reliably triggers it. That may be a good case
> for
> > an explicit unit test. IIRC, the case could be triggered by the
> > following input vector:
> > A_QA[] = { 46596096, -72118272, 78532608, -69447680, 52707328,
> > -22073344, -19890176, 50507776, -54829056, 45518848, -33939456,
> > 21086208, -7127040, -4136960, 3993600, -1699840 }
> >
> > 2) I'm not quite sure what to make of silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain_
>...
2017 Feb 10
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
...olve first -- none of which directly related
to your code.
1) The overflow condition is essentially untested because none of the
tests in "make check" reliably triggers it. That may be a good case for
an explicit unit test. IIRC, the case could be triggered by the
following input vector:
A_QA[] = { 46596096, -72118272, 78532608, -69447680, 52707328,
-22073344, -19890176, 50507776, -54829056, 45518848, -33939456,
21086208, -7127040, -4136960, 3993600, -1699840 }
2) I'm not quite sure what to make of silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain_Q24().
It seems to never be called anywhere -- except fro...
2017 Feb 13
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
...ur code.
>
> 1) The overflow condition is essentially untested because none of the
> tests in "make check" reliably triggers it. That may be a good case for
> an explicit unit test. IIRC, the case could be triggered by the
> following input vector:
> A_QA[] = { 46596096, -72118272, 78532608, -69447680, 52707328,
> -22073344, -19890176, 50507776, -54829056, 45518848, -33939456,
> 21086208, -7127040, -4136960, 3993600, -1699840 }
>
> 2) I'm not quite sure what to make of silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain_Q24().
> It seems...
2017 Feb 15
0
[PATCH] Optimize silk_LPC_inverse_pred_gain() for ARM NEON
...ssentially untested because none
> of the
> > tests in "make check" reliably triggers it. That may be a good
> case for
> > an explicit unit test. IIRC, the case could be triggered by the
> > following input vector:
> > A_QA[] = { 46596096, -72118272, 78532608, -69447680, 52707328,
> > -22073344, -19890176, 50507776, -54829056, 45518848, -33939456,
> > 21086208, -7127040, -4136960, 3993600, -1699840 }
> >
> > 2) I'm not quite sure what to make of
> silk_LPC...
2016 Jul 14
6
Several patches of ARM NEON optimization
I rebased my previous 3 patches to the current master with minor changes.
Patches 1 to 3 replace all my previous submitted patches.
Patches 4 and 5 are new.
Thanks,
Linfeng Zhang