search for: a82b9005

>Wasn't our (lld/ELF's) position on debug info size that we should focus on providing a great split-dwarf workflow and not try go too far out of our way to deduplicate >or otherwise reduce debug info size inside LLD? I recall there being some patches that made linking of large debug binaries like 1.5GB+ clang faster, but we decided to >reject those changes because split-dwarf was

...ees the DWARF (it's not in the object files), so has no deduplication to do. (llvm-dwp might see it, so the deduplication can happen there) George. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171216/a82b9005/attachment.html>