search for: a808

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "a808".

Did you mean: 808
2019 Oct 26
3
CentOS 8 and DELL 7540 Intel AX200 WIFI
...DIA Corporation TU106 USB 3.1 Host Controller [10de:1ada] (rev a1) 01:00.3 Serial bus controller [0c80]: NVIDIA Corporation TU106 USB Type-C Port Policy Controller [10de:1adb] (rev a1) 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981 [144d:a808] 03:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981 [144d:a808] 04:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06) 05:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderb...
2019 Nov 26
0
[PATCH v4] pci: prevent putting nvidia GPUs into lower device states on certain intel bridges
...6:15bb] (rev 10) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation Device [10de:1f91] (rev a1) 01:00.1 Audio device [0403]: NVIDIA Corporation Device [10de:10fa] (rev a1) 02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller [0108]: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller SM981/PM981/PM983 [144d:a808] 04:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06) 05:00.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3 Bridge [Titan Ridge 4C 2018] [8086:15ea] (rev 06) 05:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation JHL7540 Thunderbolt...
2019 Nov 21
2
[PATCH v4] pci: prevent putting nvidia GPUs into lower device states on certain intel bridges
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:06 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:47 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:53 PM Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Mika Westerberg > > > <mika.westerberg at
2008 Jun 13
16
Isolation and time
(Moving from offlist discussion.) I''m interested in opinions... Assume there are four single vcpu domains A, B, C, D, running on a 2-CPU physical machine. We wish to test for time skew on domain A. Assuming B, C, and D are all running some workload that attempts to fully saturate the (single) cpu. 1) Should the affect on domain A be essentially the same regardless of what load