search for: a632

...b1defc129 > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2 > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 > trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 > trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6 > trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b > trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a > > output scrub log: > [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023] [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] > 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick: > /media/disk13/brick13 | GFID: a50012b0-a632-477c-9923-2313928d239a} > [2017-0...

...c5286d05b8e8940d14f3d117cb90b7b1defc129 trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2 trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6 trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a output scrub log: [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023] [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick: /media/disk13/brick13 | GFID: a50012b0-a632-477c-9923-2313928d239a} [2017-09-02 05:18:14.006629] A [MSGI...

Hi, I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when running scrub it was marked as bad. Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt how can I do this? regards Amudhan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170921/f69ff7be/attachment.html>

...x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2 >>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 >>> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 >>> trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6 >>> trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b >>> trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a >>> >>> output scrub log: >>> [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023] >>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: >>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick: /media/disk13/brick13 | GFID: >>&g...

...ed.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b400019bb2 >> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 >> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 >> trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6 >> trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b >> trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a >> >> output scrub log: >> [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023] >> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: >> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick: /media/disk13/brick13 | GFID: >> a50012b0-a632-477c-99...

...t;>>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 >>>>> trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 >>>>> trusted.ec.size=0x00000000403433f6 >>>>> trusted.ec.version=0x000000000000201a000000000000201b >>>>> trusted.gfid=0xa50012b0a632477c99232313928d239a >>>>> >>>>> output scrub log: >>>>> [2017-09-02 05:18:14.003156] A [MSGID: 118023] >>>>> [bit-rot-scrub.c:244:bitd_compare_ckum] 0-qubevaultdr-bit-rot-0: >>>>> CORRUPTION DETECTED: Object /file-2 {Brick:...

...115,140,160,140, 115,170,160,170, 135,170,190,185, 150,160,180,200, 135,155,165,175, 130,150,175,170, 145,180,195,200) hibrido<-factor(rep(c(rep("P3747",4),rep("P3732",4),rep("Mol17",4),rep("A632",4),rep("LH74",4)),2)) bloque<-factor(c(rep("I",20),rep("II",20))) nitrogeno<-factor(rep(c("0","70","140","210"),10)) maiz<-data.frame(yield,hibrido,bloque,nitrogeno) names(maiz)<-c("yield","h...

...l_Signature_Logobar] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150908/4f2eb622/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 350F40DB-4457-4455-A632-0DF05738AF15[15].png Type: image/png Size: 4316 bytes Desc: 350F40DB-4457-4455-A632-0DF05738AF15[15].png URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150908/4f2eb622/attachment.png>

From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com<mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> Date: mardi 8 septembre 2015 12:50 To: Benoit Belley <benoit.belley at autodesk.com<mailto:benoit.belley at autodesk.com>>, "llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Subject:

...l_Signature_Logobar] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150924/9d2d56c1/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 350F40DB-4457-4455-A632-0DF05738AF15[32].png Type: image/png Size: 4316 bytes Desc: 350F40DB-4457-4455-A632-0DF05738AF15[32].png URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150924/9d2d56c1/attachment.png>

Hi Lang, > MCJIT does not compile lazily (though it sounds like that's not an issue here?) That is not an issue here since the code JIT's once (a few secs) and then run the generated machine code for hours. > Morten - Can you share any test cases that demonstrate the slowdown. I'd love to take a look at this. The code is massive so not practical. However I will try and

Here's a version that doesn't try to do block deletion on it's own. If you use -adce then -simplifycfg, you get what you want. It passes all tests except one, which is that we delete an invoke of a pure function, IE Transforms/ADCE/dce_pure_invoke.ll - I'm not sure why that's bad. The reason we delete it is because it returns false to I.mayHaveSideEffects(), and in particular,