search for: a5c2f507

> Are you suggesting that we should be more aggressive by default (i.e. without -fvisibility=hidden or any new options)? > I believe that will be too aggressive for class LTO visibility. > It is common to override a virtual functions across shared library boundaries I'm myself a fan of GCC's conservative approach so I'd agree with you on that. But regardless of my personal

...____ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > -- -- Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191218/a5c2f507/attachment.html>