Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "a4a69168".
2012 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
...erspective, using a Github OAuth is the *least bad* alternative, but
> it's still not a direction that I want to encourage.
>
> --Owen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121019/a4a69168/attachment.html>
2012 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
Manuel,
On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
> I hear you, but I'd be interested in why OAuth is a problem for you - as I said, if we have good arguments, the phab guys are really quick to come up with changes. I'm not deeply familiar with authentication schemes.
I know you've already resolved the issue for me with a manually created
2012 Oct 18
6
[LLVMdev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <
kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 4:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>>
>> Facebook is not the only OAuth provider though. We should be able to
>> support essentially any you would prefer if that's all. Manuel's comment
>> still stands if OAuth is a problem.
>>
>
> My