search for: a38cb19d

...(probably yes)? I think that these are mostly details rather than fundamental problems > though. > Thank you very much for your comments! Tobias -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180515/a38cb19d/attachment.html>

Hello Tobias, Thanks very much for the RFC, I think that this will be useful in persuading embedded developers to use LTO in their projects. I think the overall approach for communication between the linker and code generator sounds reasonable. I've got some questions/comments based on some experience with Arm's proprietary linker, which supports LTO but has a different linker script

RFC: (Thin)LTO with Linker Scripts At the last US LLVM Developers' Meeting, we presented [1] a proposal for linker script support in (Thin)LTO. In this RFC, I would like to describe the proposal in more detail and invite the community's feedback, so we can build consensus on the upstream implementation. The end goal of this effort is to extend the benefits of (Thin)LTO, including