Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "a2e60f96".
2013 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
...lds, but will
it need to have mangled names that today, are quoted?
Do we still have the notion that named metadata cannot be deleted?
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130621/a2e60f96/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>
> More details please :]
> What do you mean by "name the metadata"? Are you referring to the name field
> of the MDNode?
Using named metadata rather than unnamed metadata.
rather than having:
!llvm.hardref = !{metadata !"foo.h::myClass", !3, metadata
!"bar.h:myEnum", !4} ...
2013 Jun 21
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO
More details please :]
What do you mean by "name the metadata"? Are you referring to the name field of the MDNode?
Thanks,
Manman
On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:19 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013 1:19 AM, "Jeremy Lakeman" <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn't it be simpler to name the metadata based on the hash of the content?