search for: a29b023

...? OK, here it is. Untested so far, and no skb wrapper. Pls let me know whether this is what you had in mind. --> ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h index a29b023..e576801 100644 --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h @@ -354,20 +354,14 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_init(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, int pad, gfp_t gfp return 0; } -static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp, - void (*destroy)(vo...

...? OK, here it is. Untested so far, and no skb wrapper. Pls let me know whether this is what you had in mind. --> ptr_ring: support resizing multiple queues Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h index a29b023..e576801 100644 --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h @@ -354,20 +354,14 @@ static inline int ptr_ring_init(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, int pad, gfp_t gfp return 0; } -static inline int ptr_ring_resize(struct ptr_ring *r, int size, gfp_t gfp, - void (*destroy)(vo...

We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was

We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was