search for: a27d4af1

> In other words, I'd like to take a set of bytecode files, optimize them > together even though they don't form a complete program, and then write > out the new (optimized) bytecode files. It would be preferable to write > them out to a single archive rather than to individual bytecode files > again. Can this be done in LLVM today? If not, what would it take to >

I'm wondering if LLVM has or should have support for a grouping of modules (which I'll call a package). That is, a package is a partial program contains many (probably related) modules. One might roughly compare it to a shared library. The reason that it is important is that we want to (a) distribute packages, not individual modules and (b) optimize the entire package (e.g. IPO) as a

...ough to load only the one module needed? Does the notion of module inside a module even exist? P.S. Bug 114 (-Wold-style-cast) has a patch ready. Reid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/a27d4af1/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/a27d4af1/attachm...