Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "a27513".
Did you mean:
27513
2018 May 09
0
"Replace locked IO with unlocked IO" optimizations
It's probably worth going into a little more detail... a lot of people
read llvmdev, and most of them won't click the link or follow the whole
discussion.
The transform in question is replacing "fputc(...)" with
"fputc_unlocked(...)" when we can prove the FILE* doesn't escape. The
question is whether it's safe for the compiler to emit a call to
2018 May 08
2
"Replace locked IO with unlocked IO" optimizations
Hello,
Please check this patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45736
as Eli noted, other opinions are highly welcomed..
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180509/c2eb9888/attachment.html>
2018 May 09
1
"Replace locked IO with unlocked IO" optimizations
.../mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
--
Hal Finkel
Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180508/a27513ed/attachment.html>