Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "a140".
Did you mean:
140
2017 Jun 20
2
[ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance
...into perspective: I was getting better behaviour from NFS4
> on a gigabit connection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't
> feel right at all.
>
> My volume configuration looks like this:
>
> Volume Name: vmssd
> Type: Distributed-Replicate
> Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cfe464853
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
> Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
> Brick3: ovirt2:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick (arbiter)
> Br...
2017 Jun 20
0
[ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance
...better behaviour from NFS4
>> on a gigabit connection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't
>> feel right at all.
>>
>> My volume configuration looks like this:
>>
>> Volume Name: vmssd
>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>> Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cfe464853
>> Status: Started
>> Snapshot Count: 0
>> Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
>> Transport-type: tcp
>> Bricks:
>> Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
>> Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
>> Brick3: ovirt2:/gluster/ss...
2017 Jun 20
5
[ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance
...gt;> on a gigabit connection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't
>>> feel right at all.
>>>
>>> My volume configuration looks like this:
>>>
>>> Volume Name: vmssd
>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>>> Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cfe464853
>>> Status: Started
>>> Snapshot Count: 0
>>> Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>> Bricks:
>>> Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
>>> Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
>>...
2017 Jun 20
0
[ovirt-users] Very poor GlusterFS performance
...ween the three servers).
To put this into perspective: I was getting better behaviour from NFS4
on a gigabit connection than I am with GlusterFS on 10G: that doesn't
feel right at all.
My volume configuration looks like this:
Volume Name: vmssd
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: d5a5ddd1-a140-4e0d-b514-701cfe464853
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 2 x (2 + 1) = 6
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
Brick2: ovirt1:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick
Brick3: ovirt2:/gluster/ssd0_vmssd/brick (arbiter)
Brick4: ovirt3:/gluster/ssd1_vmssd/brick
Brick5...
2013 Mar 13
5
string split at xth position
Hi,
I have a vector of strings like:
c("a1b1","a2b2","a1b2") which I want to spilt into two parts like:
c("a1","a2","a2") and c("b1","b2,"b2"). So there is
always a first part with a+number and a second part with b+number.
Unfortunately there is no separator I could use to directly split
the vectors.. Any idea
2007 Aug 29
11
tc not matching
Dear all,
I''m having real problems getting tc to do anything useful at all. I''m
also under pressure to get this fixed before the students start arriving
later this month (I work in a university).
In short, I want each IP address to be hard limited to 128kbit down,
64kbit up, never to be allowed more bandwidth than this. It is also
important that the latency remains