Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "a0a0ac7d".
2016 Dec 31
2
SCCP is not always correct in presence of undef (+ proposed fix)
...ctually do that.
(and as mentioned, you don't need a separate post-resolver to do *what we
do now*, and so far, it has just been a source of bugs :()
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161230/a0a0ac7d/attachment.html>
2016 Dec 31
0
SCCP is not always correct in presence of undef (+ proposed fix)
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 9:04 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Looking at the original bug, it seems like a straightforward
>> undef-propagation bug to me -- SCCP was folding "or undef, constant"