search for: a0340dfa

...> > > _______________________________________________ > opus mailing list > opus at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20180114/a0340dfa/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bahjffad.png Type: image/png Size: 12590 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20180114/a0340dfa/attachment-0007.png> -------------- next par...

<style>table.customTableClassName {margin-bottom: 10px;border-collapse: collapse;display: table;}.customTableClassName td, .customTableClassName th {border: 1px solid #ddd;}</style><div id="write-custom-write" tabindex="0" style="font-size: 12px; font-family: 宋体; outline: medium none currentcolor;"><p style="margin:0px;">Dear

...ry to reduce this time? Also, unsure why encode is taking less > time than decode... Last month a user posted some benchmarks on a STM32F4, which is a the same core as your cc3220 but at 168MHz rather than 80Mhz. Here's the results: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20180114/a0340dfa/attachment-0012.png Based on that it seems that your decode should take about ~10ms, so it'll be a bit of a squeeze to get full duplex in. But your numbers are significantly worse. Are you running out of XIP flash? Do you have all the flash accelerators and caches enabled? ------------------...

Thanks Jean-Marc, I was able to get both encode and decode working the CC3220 device! But for bi-directional communication, I need decode and encode to occur in less time than the frame size I’m sending (20 ms). Currently decode takes 16~22 ms and encode is ~13 ms. What is the best way to try to reduce this time? Also, unsure why encode is taking less time than decode... I've also