search for: _write

..."/export/home/wanjm/temp/read.txt",O_RDWR|O_CREAT); while(1) { sleep(1); write(fd,value,strlen(value)); } } //////////////////////////////////////// and the dtrace script (write.d) is: syscall::write:entry, fbt::write:entry, pid$1::write:entry, pid$1::write:return, pid$1::_write:entry /pid==$1/ { printf("%s:%s:%s:%s\n",probeprov,probemod,probefunc,probename); stack(100); ustack(100); } /////////////////////////////// when runs the script, the result is : pid17632:libc.so.1:write:entry libc.so.1`write a.out`main+0x43 a.out...

.../home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ > CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): > undefined reference to `_memcpy' > /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ > CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): > undefined reference to `_write' > /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ > CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): > undefined reference to `_write' > /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ > CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x23b): > undefined refe...

...d reference to `_strlen' /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): undefined reference to `_memcpy' /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): undefined reference to `_write' /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): undefined reference to `_write' /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x23b): undefined reference to `_write' /home/foad/l...

...reference to `_strlen' /home/ang/build/llvm-coff/runtime/libprofile/Release/ CommonProfiling.o:CommonPro filing.c:(.text+0x19b): undefined reference to `_memcpy' /home/ang/build/llvm-coff/runtime/libprofile/Release/ CommonProfiling.o:CommonPro filing.c:(.text+0x1fb): undefined reference to `_write' /home/ang/build/llvm-coff/runtime/libprofile/Release/ CommonProfiling.o:CommonPro filing.c:(.text+0x21a): undefined reference to `_write' /home/ang/build/llvm-coff/runtime/libprofile/Release/ CommonProfiling.o:CommonPro filing.c:(.text+0x23b): undefined reference to `_write' /home/ang/...

Hi all, I have a Cisco 7905g with the default cm firmware. It is connected to * using chan_sccp.so. Normal operations with this phone work perfect. Now I'm implementing a click to call app in php. This php app connects to the manager interface and sends the following down the line: $this->_write($fp, "Action: Originate"); $this->_write($fp, "Channel: ".$this->user_device); $this->_write($fp, "Context: ".$this->context); $this->_write($fp, "Exten: ".$this->whotocall); $this->_write($fp, "Priority: 1"); $this->_write($...

...jdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): >> undefined reference to `_memcpy' >> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): >> undefined reference to `_write' >> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): >> undefined reference to `_write' >> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x23b): &...

I am working on the MASM backend. I do not know what to do about '_write' and '_abort'. They seem to be added to a modules functions as externals even when they are not being used. They cannot just be remove just in case they are being used. What are they there for ? The only options I have are to scan the whole module for uses of them, or to provide libra...

...profile/Release/ >>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): >>> undefined reference to `_memcpy' >>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): >>> undefined reference to `_write' >>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): >>> undefined reference to `_write' >>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfilin...

On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: > I am working on the MASM backend. > > I do not know what to do about '_write' and '_abort'. They seem to be > added to a modules functions as externals even when they are not being > used. Why is that a problem? > They cannot just be remove just in case they are being used. What are > they there for ? They are part of the exception handling sup...

...;>>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): >>>> undefined reference to `_memcpy' >>>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): >>>> undefined reference to `_write' >>>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>>> CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): >>>> undefined reference to `_write' >>>> /home/foad/llvm/objdir-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/ >>>> CommonProfil...

...thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x19b): undefined reference to `_memcpy' /cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x1fb): undefined reference to `_write' /cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x21a): undefined reference to `_write' /cygdrive/c/projects/thesis/llvm-suite-2.6/llvm-2.6/runtime/libprofile/Release/CommonProfiling.o:CommonProfiling.c:(.text+0x23b)...

Has anyone written any "cookie" class using prototype? Basically, what I am looking for is if there is an easy way to store mutiple cookies in a single cookie using hash or something - easy writing and retrieval (updating the cookie value). For eg - If I had 25 cookies for my domain 5 of the cookies would either get dropped or not be set (as there is a limit of 20 cookies per domain).

Hello... In regards to http://www.freebsd.org/security/ , from what I understand the FreeBSD 4.x branch is generally winding down in favor of the 5.x/6.x branches. It would be nice to know ahead of time if 4.11 will also be an extended release, or if that would fall to 4.12. For those of running 4.8 (expiring about the same time as 4.11 is released) we would be in a better position to know

Hi Experts, _write value ------------- Distribution ------------- count 4096 | 0 8192 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ 1161825 16384 |...

...libc.so.1`_free_unlocked 1 0.1% gunzip`unzip 1 0.1% ld.so.1`strcmp 1 0.1% gunzip`inflate_dynamic 1 0.1% libc.so.1`_write 1 0.1% gunzip`write_buf 1 0.1% gunzip`0x2d990 2 0.3% libc.so.1`write 2 0.3% gunzip`0x2d994...

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

wow. i admired nick's _write-up_ of "elastic tabstops" when i read it... but i skipped his _example_, since java is disabled in my browser. during a re-read, i turned on java, temporarily, to see his example. and i'm _very_ impressed. in real time, on an interactive web-page, nick makes elastic tabstops work...

...Compiling samba 2.2.2 on Solaris 2.7 server I get the following errors: (These are not in sequence.) Compiling lib/system.c lib/system.c: In function `sys_readdir': lib/system.c:234: warning: return from incompatible pointer type lib/util.c: In function `transfer_file': lib/util.c:559: `_write' undeclared (first use in this function) lib/util.c:559: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once lib/util.c:559: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `lib/util.o' Any ideas? Thank you, -- ______________________________...

...entry in the pfns array. > > -For instance, if the device flags for range.flags are:: > +For instance if the device driver wants pages for a range with at least read > +permission, it sets:: > > - range.flags[HMM_PFN_VALID] = (1 << 63); > - range.flags[HMM_PFN_WRITE] = (1 << 62); > - > -and the device driver wants pages for a range with at least read permission, > -it sets:: > - > - range->default_flags = (1 << 63); > + range->default_flags = HMM_PFN_REQ_FAULT; > range->pfn_flags_mask = 0; > > an...

...ifferent then the x86 Debug build. Call stack using LLVM in x86 Debug: ntdll.dll!778515de() [Les frames ci-dessous sont peut-être incorrects et/ou manquants, aucun symbole chargé pour ntdll.dll] ntdll.dll!778515de() ntdll.dll!7784014e() > msvcr100d.dll!_write(int fh, const void * buf, unsigned int cnt) Ligne 83 + 0x9 octets C msvcr100d.dll!_write(int fh, const void * buf, unsigned int cnt) Ligne 82 + 0xc octets C 013df8f4() msvcp100d.dll!std::_Container_base12::_Orphan_all() Ligne 200 C++ LLVM_Test_Console.exe!std::_S...