search for: _which

...s, then building a not needed bottleneck by shifting over the local delivery via director and LMTP to fewer nodes is just braindead creation of high loads on few boxes. And btw it scales perfectly because all that is needed if load increases is up'ing additional nodes for SMTP/delivery or IMAP _which are all the same (of two types)_. The loadbalancer needed for this can be equally used for e.g. web, ftp and other services. So there is absolutely no extra stuff needed for the mail setup. -- Regards, Stephan

...r > binutils, it is irrelevant. The OP point is that LLVM is not a > self-sufficient tool on this aspect. > Actually, I think Bill's right on target. The OP was implying that LLVM is incomplete because it depends on GCC in the backend, which is incorrect. It depends on binutils, _which GCC also depends on_. Thus LLVM is certainly no less complete than GCC in that sense. I think the point is that implementing our own linker is definitely beyond the purview of LLVM, and implementing our own object file writer/assembler is honestly pretty low on the priority queue. GCC, t...

...n messages in the models seems fundamentally wrong because they are a view level thing (for example you may want two different mesages in different places depending on the reason for the model failing, or you might want different languages) The solution? Well it''s simple...we need to know _which validation failed_ in the error array. So right now the errors look like this "field" => "message" In order to be able to specify a custom error message properly we need to know why the field failed so the appropriate structure would look something like: @user.errors = {:v...

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:40:55 +0200 Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2017, at 21.33, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Me again have to stress that our former implementation of the lda process > > did do exactly nothing to all the dovecot files, and everything worked > > pretty well. We had no problems

Not that I sympathize with the OP's manners but... Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> writes: > On May 10, 2008, at 7:55 PM, kr512 wrote: > >> See how gcc is invoked to generate the final executable >> file. This means LLVM is an incomplete backend, >> unfortunately. >> > That's only a convenience. GCC generates assembly code too and calls

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:59:28 +1000 Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > On 14/03/2016 09:59, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:42 +1000 > > Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote: > > > >> On 13/03/2016 20:47, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:06 +0000 > >>

Morning All: Having problems installing this one into my R setup and wondered if anyone on the list had the same problem and found a workable solution. First to the system particulars: OS is the Hardy Heron edition of Ubuntu Linux R version is 2.13.1 Java installation is sun-java6 Next up is the result of javareconf: R CMD javareconf Java interpreter : /usr/bin/java Java version : 1.5.0

I manage the audio-video section of the GNU web site http://audio-video.gnu.org/. I have tried the Theora codec and am very impressed by the level of integration with free desktops and the bit rate/quality combinations. I intend to move all video content to the Theora codec partly for technical reasons but mainly to promote free and open formats. I do have longer term worries, projecting

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi df". The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a general consensus about the wording. Moreover I still didn''t understand how btrfs was using the disks. A my first attempt was to develop a new command which shows how the disks