search for: _where

Hello...Sorry for posting this here.but I can't see any other way to get a hold of JOHN BROWN I placed an order of 4 - SPA2000's with Chagres Technologies over 2 months ago. John what is the status of my order? I have emailed, faxed and called..but still no reply from you or your company. If you cannot get the product, a refund would be in-order... Thanks for your help!

...nt _Line) Line 968 C++ zig.exe!std::vector<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64,std::allocator<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64> >::_Insert<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64 const * __ptr64>(std::_Vector_const_iterator<std::_Vector_val<std::_Simple_types<lld::coff::Chunk *> > > _Where, lld::coff::Chunk * const * _First, lld::coff::Chunk * const * _Last, std::forward_iterator_tag __formal) Line 1421 C++ zig.exe!std::vector<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64,std::allocator<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64> >::insert<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64 const * __ptr64>(std::_Vec...

...xe!std::vector<lld::coff::Chunk * >> __ptr64,std::allocator<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64> >> >::_Insert<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64 const * >> __ptr64>(std::_Vector_const_iterator<std::_Vector_val<std::_Simple_types<lld::coff::Chunk >> *> > > _Where, lld::coff::Chunk * const * _First, lld::coff::Chunk * const * >> _Last, std::forward_iterator_tag __formal) Line 1421 C++ >> zig.exe!std::vector<lld::coff::Chunk * >> __ptr64,std::allocator<lld::coff::Chunk * __ptr64> >> >::insert<lld::coff::Chunk * _...

...uot;, which reads: template<class _Pr, class _Ty1, class _Ty2> inline bool __CLRCALL_OR_CDECL _Debug_lt_pred(_Pr _Pred, _Ty1& _Left, const _Ty2& _Right, const wchar_t *_Where, unsigned int _Line) { // test if _Pred(_Left, _Right) and _Pred is strict weak ordering if (!_Pred(_Left, _Right)) return (false); else if (_Pred(_Right, _Left)) _DEBUG_ERROR2("invalid operator<", _Where, _Line); return (true); }...

On Thu, 31 May 2007, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Our project is cross platform and on Windows we use VStudio 2005. > VStudio presents a couple of issues related around it's STL > implementation and also it's non-respect for the no-return semantic of > abort(). Ok. We want the source to be portable, so it's goodness to get these fixes into the main tree. > I've fixed

...template<class _Pr, class _Ty1, class _Ty2> inline > bool __CLRCALL_OR_CDECL _Debug_lt_pred(_Pr _Pred, > _Ty1& _Left, > const _Ty2& _Right, > const wchar_t *_Where, > unsigned int _Line) > { // test if _Pred(_Left, _Right) and _Pred is strict weak ordering > > if (!_Pred(_Left, _Right)) > return (false); > else if (_Pred(_Right, _Left)) > _DEBUG_ERROR2("invalid operator<", _W...

Hola LLVMers, Our project is cross platform and on Windows we use VStudio 2005. VStudio presents a couple of issues related around it's STL implementation and also it's non-respect for the no-return semantic of abort(). I've fixed it locally, but I'd like to send a patch so I don't have to do this every time I update from the source repository. So.... if I'm

...return I; } return E; } The debug paths through VStudio's STL through the std::lower_bound function get to this template: template<class _Ty1, class _Ty2> inline bool __CLRCALL_OR_CDECL _Debug_lt(const _Ty1& _Left, const _Ty2& _Right, const wchar_t *_Where, unsigned int _Line) { // test if _Left < _Right and operator< is strict weak ordering if (!(_Left < _Right)) return (false); else if (_Right < _Left) _DEBUG_ERROR2("invalid operator<", _Where, _Line); return (true); } The critical feature is that the A<B (A an...