search for: _wc_sec

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_wc_sec".

Did you mean: wc_sec
2008 Aug 06
3
[PATCH RFC] do_settime is backwards?!
While digging through the time code, I found something very strange in do_settime: x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base; y = do_div(x, 1000000000); spin_lock(&wc_lock); wc_sec = _wc_sec = (u32)x; wc_nsec = _wc_nsec = (u32)y; spin_unlock(&wc_lock); The value "x" appears to be the number of nanoseconds, while the value "y" is the value in seconds. The assignments to wc_sec and wc_nsec seem backwards, though... I hope I''ve overlooked some...
2008 Nov 25
7
when timer go back in dom0 save and restore or migrate, PV domain hung
..._update_begin(&shared_info(d, wc_version)); shared_info(d, wc_sec) = wc_sec + d->time_offset_seconds; shared_info(d, wc_nsec) = wc_nsec; version_update_end(&shared_info(d, wc_version)); +out: spin_unlock(&wc_lock); } @@ -751,7 +754,6 @@ u64 x; u32 y, _wc_sec, _wc_nsec; struct domain *d; - x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base; y = do_div(x, 1000000000); @@ -1050,7 +1052,6 @@ struct tm wallclock_time(void) { uint64_t seconds; - if ( !wc_sec ) return (struct tm) { 0 }; diff -r a5ed0dbc829f xen/...
2008 Nov 27
1
Re: RE: Re: Re: when timer go back in dom0 save and restore ormigrate, PV domain hung
...shared_info(d, wc_nsec) = wc_nsec; version_update_end(&shared_info(d, wc_version)); +out: spin_unlock(&wc_lock); } @@ -751,7 +754,6 @@ u64 x; u32 y, _wc_sec, _wc_nsec; struct domain *d; - x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base; y = do_div(x, 1000000000); @@ -1050,7 +1052,6 @@ struct tm wa...