Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_wc_sec".
Did you mean:
wc_sec
2008 Aug 06
3
[PATCH RFC] do_settime is backwards?!
While digging through the time code, I found something very strange
in do_settime:
x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base;
y = do_div(x, 1000000000);
spin_lock(&wc_lock);
wc_sec = _wc_sec = (u32)x;
wc_nsec = _wc_nsec = (u32)y;
spin_unlock(&wc_lock);
The value "x" appears to be the number of nanoseconds, while
the value "y" is the value in seconds. The assignments to
wc_sec and wc_nsec seem backwards, though...
I hope I''ve overlooked some...
2008 Nov 25
7
when timer go back in dom0 save and restore or migrate, PV domain hung
..._update_begin(&shared_info(d, wc_version));
shared_info(d, wc_sec) = wc_sec + d->time_offset_seconds;
shared_info(d, wc_nsec) = wc_nsec;
version_update_end(&shared_info(d, wc_version));
+out:
spin_unlock(&wc_lock);
}
@@ -751,7 +754,6 @@
u64 x;
u32 y, _wc_sec, _wc_nsec;
struct domain *d;
-
x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs - system_time_base;
y = do_div(x, 1000000000);
@@ -1050,7 +1052,6 @@
struct tm wallclock_time(void)
{
uint64_t seconds;
-
if ( !wc_sec )
return (struct tm) { 0 };
diff -r a5ed0dbc829f xen/...
2008 Nov 27
1
Re: RE: Re: Re: when timer go back in dom0 save and restore ormigrate, PV domain hung
...shared_info(d, wc_nsec) = wc_nsec;
version_update_end(&shared_info(d, wc_version));
+out:
spin_unlock(&wc_lock);
}
@@ -751,7 +754,6 @@
u64 x;
u32 y, _wc_sec, _wc_nsec;
struct domain *d;
-
x = (secs * 1000000000ULL) + (u64)nsecs -
system_time_base;
y = do_div(x, 1000000000);
@@ -1050,7 +1052,6 @@
struct tm wa...